1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00385470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear DNA contents of Pisum genotypes grown in vivo and in vitro

Abstract: The nuclear DNA content of prophase nuclei in root tips of two cultivars and two primitive lines of Pisum sativum and of Pisum fulvum have been determined, using a scanning microdensitometer. The nuclear DNA contents differed significantly between the genotypes investigated but there was no correlation with their supposed phylogenetic positions.A loss of 73% of the DNA from cells of aseptically cultured excised pea roots has been recently reported (Abbott, 1971). In marked contrast to this claim, our measureme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1975
1975
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Schweizer and Davies (1972) found a statistically significant 1.07-fold maximum difference between four Pisum sativum accessions, which is by and large compatible with our observations. Compared with the much larger difference between root samples found in the same investigation (see above) this variation appears inconspicuous.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schweizer and Davies (1972) found a statistically significant 1.07-fold maximum difference between four Pisum sativum accessions, which is by and large compatible with our observations. Compared with the much larger difference between root samples found in the same investigation (see above) this variation appears inconspicuous.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…There is also a vague impression that quick-and -slow-growing meristems, and main and side roots give slightly different Feulgen values; however, our search for reproducible differences yielded mostly nonsignificant results. These differences, up to 4%, were smaller than the 13% reported by Schweizer and Davies (1972) between main roots from seedlings and laterals on detached main roots cultured in vitro. Moreover, the differences found between telophases and prophases of about 3% show that variation between samples in that size order must not be taken too ples in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…For instance, A bbott (1971) claim ed th a t the D N A content of cells of excised pea roots cultured in vitro was only 27 % of th a t in cells of attached control roots. Schweizer & Davies (1972) repeated A bbott's experiments and found no evidence to support his claim, although they did find significant differences in 4(7 DNA contents of up to 7 % between cultivated varieties of Pisum sativum and P. sativum ssp. abyssinicum.…”
Section: Intraspecific Variation In D N a Amount Per Genomementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Grant (1969) used Feulgen cytophotometry to determine DNA contents and ploidy levels in Betula species, and Bennett (1971) has presented extensive data on the correlation of DNA content with growth habit for herbaceous flowering plants. Using the same techniques, Schweizer and Davies ( 1972) and Woodard and Swift (1964) determined DNA content of individual chromosomes in Trillium erectum. The method, with slight modifications, has been successfully applied to animal tissues (Hughes-Schrader, 1953;Evans, 1956;John and Hewitt, 1966;Beamish, Merriless, and Crossman, 1971;James, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%