2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 52

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 256 publications
5
59
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These two values agree within the stated uncertainties (the relative difference is about 0.22%); however, this difference of about 10 keV might be explained by two gamma-rays of high energy and very low emission intensity that are not yet placed in the decay scheme [4]: 1441(1) keV and 1839.14(17) keV.…”
Section: Nd2016supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two values agree within the stated uncertainties (the relative difference is about 0.22%); however, this difference of about 10 keV might be explained by two gamma-rays of high energy and very low emission intensity that are not yet placed in the decay scheme [4]: 1441(1) keV and 1839.14(17) keV.…”
Section: Nd2016supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The most recent ENSDF evaluation for the mass chain A=52 was studied [4]. The energy of the nuclear levels, and the spin and parity values were adopted from this evaluation, while the total decay energies are from the atomic mass evaluation [5].…”
Section: Evaluation Steps and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy calibration at high energy was performed using the γ lines observed in the decay of 52 Co, 6 + (Section IV). This procedure gave an energy of 5185(10) keV for the above γ-ray, which was then attributed to the 2 + → 2 + transition between the 2 + IAS in 52 Fe (at 6034(5) and/or 6044(5) keV [10,18], where having one or both states does not change our conclusions) and the 849 keV level [ Fig. 3(a)].…”
Section: The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…4(b) and (c), respectively]. The γ-ray seen at 1910 keV corresponds to a 2 + → 2 + transition between the 2759 and 849 keV known levels [10] in 52 Fe [ Fig. 3(a)] and it is expected to be seen in the decay of the 52 Co, 2 + isomer [8].…”
Section: The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation