Nuclear data sheets for A = 47

Comparison of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Structure Mesured with a Microwave Temperature Profiler and a Mie Scattering Lidar

“…There is good agreement at E , = 7 MeV between the present values and those previously reported by Rapaport et al(1966). The 1 transfer assignments made from the angular distributions, with the exception of the level at E, = 1-254 MeV, are all compatible with the J" values given in the latest Nuclear Data Tables (Halbert 1977). …”

Integration and Evaluation of Multichannel Photonic Crystal Wavelength Filters Consisting of Autocloned Ta2O5/SiO2Multilayer Thin Films

“…The table gives both the excitation energies and peak cross sections for the present data. The excitation energies which have an estimated uncertainty of i 10 keV are in good agreement with the previous published data (Halbert 1977). The experimental angular distributions for most of the levels measured are displayed as discrete points in figures 4 and 5.…”

“…Therefore in the predictions shown in figures 4 and 5 it has been assumed that only one of the two states makes a significant contribution. Both the states contributing to group 16 have J" = 3- (Halbert 1977) and hence different admixtures of these states would not affect the shape or magnitude of the predicted cross section. The group at E, = 2.162 MeV has possible contributions from states with J" = 4and J" = 3- (Halbert 1977).…”

“…Both the states contributing to group 16 have J" = 3- (Halbert 1977) and hence different admixtures of these states would not affect the shape or magnitude of the predicted cross section. The group at E, = 2.162 MeV has possible contributions from states with J" = 4and J" = 3- (Halbert 1977). The shape of the angular distributions, especially at 10 MeV, indicates that the direct component is due to the state with J" = $-.…”

Non-Essential Sets for the Dirichlet Problem

“…The particle configurations of low-lying levels of 45Sc, 47Sc and 4'Sc have been studied extensively via inelastic scattering, proton capture and proton stripping reactions (cf the compilations of Beene (1977), Halbert (1977) and Raman (1970)). The hole state configurations have been investigated by means of the (d, 3He) reactions on 46Ti, 48Ti and 50Ti at different energies (Ohnuma 1971, Yntema and Satchler 1964, Newman and Halbert 1968, Mairle and Wagner 1972, Hinterberger et a1 1967 and by means of the 48Ti(t, U ) reaction (Baudinet-Robinet et a1 1971 ).…”