1996
DOI: 10.1006/ndsh.1996.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 152

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
60
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now we remark that Eq. (20) in the variable φ is solved under the periodic boundary condition ϕ(φ + 2π) = ϕ(φ). On the other hand the assumption β 2 > 0, which is equivalent to the consideration of an infinite potential wall at β 2 = 0 (or φ = ±π/2), imposes the additional condition…”
Section: Analytic Solutions and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we remark that Eq. (20) in the variable φ is solved under the periodic boundary condition ϕ(φ + 2π) = ϕ(φ). On the other hand the assumption β 2 > 0, which is equivalent to the consideration of an infinite potential wall at β 2 = 0 (or φ = ±π/2), imposes the additional condition…”
Section: Analytic Solutions and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some unknown γ rays were assigned to 174 Re, such as the 188-, 388-, and 465-keV lines. It should be noted that the well-established high-spin level schemes for 152 Sm [22], 173,175 Re, 171 Ta [23], and 174 W were very useful for the assignment of new γ rays to 174 Re.…”
Section: A Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration for energies and intensities of lines in the 152 Eu m,g decay was achieved internally; i.e., use was made of the fact that the strong lines in the 152 Eu g decay serve [12] as a secondary γ -ray energy and intensity calibration source. Peak areas were fitted in all spectra using the program GF3 [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%