1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02740811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear charge distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As anticipated in Sect. 2 the main peak of the function w,(x) remains at the same position while that of %(x) is shifted to greater values of x in accordance with (11).…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Weighting Functionssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As anticipated in Sect. 2 the main peak of the function w,(x) remains at the same position while that of %(x) is shifted to greater values of x in accordance with (11).…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Weighting Functionssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…5. Weighting functions w, (solid line) and wp (dashed line) for 4~ calculated by the single-particle potential method of Malaguti et al [10,11] at least for 1.5<x<2.5 fm, are closer to one another in the correlated case that in the single-particle model. This explains why the CFM contains some high-momentum components which are however weaker than those, induced by the Jastrow-type SRC, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Weighting Functionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 or the first terms in (3.2) and (3.8), respectively). For nuclei with total momentum J= 0 (the case of the closed shell nuclei) the one-body density matrix has to be diagonalized within the { ~/'m } subspace of the complete space of the natural orbitals [26]. Moreover, the restriction to nuclei with closed major shells completely determine the angular part of the natural orbitals.…”
Section: Natural Orbital Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%