2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2008.4711772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NR objective continuous video quality assessment model based on frame quality measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kawayoke and Horita's metric [8] estimates quality by a Sobel spatial measurement operator on individual MPEG-2 digital frames first, then adjusts the frame quality using the information from spatial and temporal information respectively. The proposed metric focuses on monitoring the quality of service (QoS) for visual communications.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kawayoke and Horita's metric [8] estimates quality by a Sobel spatial measurement operator on individual MPEG-2 digital frames first, then adjusts the frame quality using the information from spatial and temporal information respectively. The proposed metric focuses on monitoring the quality of service (QoS) for visual communications.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, most pixel-based video quality metrics are still full-reference or reducedreference metrics and only a small subset consists of no-reference metrics exits [57,58,70,135,224,370]. Note that there is no standardised pixel-based no-reference video quality metrics available, yet.…”
Section: Summary Of the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a small subset of all reviewed metrics consider the temporal dimension of video without any significant temporal pooling or at least consider relatively large interval of a few seconds [11,135,172,203,220,332], but two of these metrics aim at providing continuous quality predictions and therefore provide no overall quality prediction [172,203].…”
Section: Summary Of the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations