2011
DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2010.533221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novice Teacher Learning and Motivation Across Contexts: Assessment Tools as Boundary Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in her study on literacy motivation, Nolen (2007) detailed how the meaning of reading and writing fluctuated as the children progressed from Grades 1 to 3; she also described how the meaning of literacy changed with specific teacher practices (e.g., whether individual differences were made more or less salient) and as the nature of the writing task itself changed. Similarly, in a more recent study, Nolen and her colleagues described how novice teachers' motivation to adopt specific assessment tools (e.g., tests, portfolios, rubrics) changed over a 4-year period-from the time they were enrolled in a secondary teacher education program through their 2nd year of professional teaching (Nolen et al, 2011). Again, in line with a situated perspective, their analysis centered on describing in great detail how these novice teachers' use of assessment tools and practices changed as they renegotiated their evolving identities and roles in and across specific contexts.…”
Section: Relativismmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in her study on literacy motivation, Nolen (2007) detailed how the meaning of reading and writing fluctuated as the children progressed from Grades 1 to 3; she also described how the meaning of literacy changed with specific teacher practices (e.g., whether individual differences were made more or less salient) and as the nature of the writing task itself changed. Similarly, in a more recent study, Nolen and her colleagues described how novice teachers' motivation to adopt specific assessment tools (e.g., tests, portfolios, rubrics) changed over a 4-year period-from the time they were enrolled in a secondary teacher education program through their 2nd year of professional teaching (Nolen et al, 2011). Again, in line with a situated perspective, their analysis centered on describing in great detail how these novice teachers' use of assessment tools and practices changed as they renegotiated their evolving identities and roles in and across specific contexts.…”
Section: Relativismmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A prime example of a situative approach to motivation include the longitudinal work of Nolen and her colleagues (Nolen, 2007;Nolen, Horn, Ward, & Childers, 2011;Nolen & Ward, 2009), whose ethnographic studies focus primarily on describing how the motivation of students and novice teachers change over time and as they navigate different contexts. For example, in her study on literacy motivation, Nolen (2007) detailed how the meaning of reading and writing fluctuated as the children progressed from Grades 1 to 3; she also described how the meaning of literacy changed with specific teacher practices (e.g., whether individual differences were made more or less salient) and as the nature of the writing task itself changed.…”
Section: Relativismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A student team must negotiate the sometimes conflicting values and goals of these worlds to determine what the team is trying to accomplish together, their joint enterprise [14][15][16]. The closer this joint enterprise is to what occurs in industry workgroups, the more authentic the activity.…”
Section: Hybridity In the Vcvd Project: Engineering World Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aligned with the findings of surveys (Mertler, 2003;DeLuca and Klinger, 2010;Alkharusi et al, 2011) and more in depth studies (Graham, 2005;Buck et al, 2010;Nolen et al, 2011;Taber et al, 2011;Eyers, 2014), experiencing and using assessment on practicum reinforced and extended assessment capability. Unfortunately, but perhaps predictably, the experiences practicum offered were inconsistent in the extent to which they enabled the teacher candidates to actually involve students as partners in the assessment process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of this literature (Hill and Eyers, 2016) four main influences were found: the teacher candidate conceptions that underpin such learning (for example, Brown, 2011;Brown and Remesal, 2012); the relationship between preservice assessment teaching and teacher candidate learning (for example, Buck et al, 2010;Siegel and Wissehr, 2011;DeLuca et al, 2012); the practical use by teacher candidates of assessment in classrooms during preparation (Graham, 2005;DeLuca and Klinger, 2010;Nolen et al, 2011; and others); and other factors such as personal dimensions (Eyers, 2014;Jiang, 2015), layered contexts (Nolen et al, 2011;Jiang, 2015) and broader policy and societal issues (Smith et al, 2014). Few, however, appear to have investigated how these aspects influence teacher candidates' assessment learning in relation to beliefs and formative practices that encourage student self-regulation.…”
Section: Previous Studies Regarding Teacher Preparation For Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%