2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-016-0710-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Spectroscopic Method for Determination and Quantification of Saffron Adulteration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all models, optimum number of latent variables (LVs) were determined by root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV). The performance of the final models were evaluated in accordance with the correlated coefficient of determination (R), and RMSEP values (Varliklioz Er et al 2016). The data were processed in MATLAB software version 7.10 (Math Works, Natick, MA, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all models, optimum number of latent variables (LVs) were determined by root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV). The performance of the final models were evaluated in accordance with the correlated coefficient of determination (R), and RMSEP values (Varliklioz Er et al 2016). The data were processed in MATLAB software version 7.10 (Math Works, Natick, MA, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In samples of saffron, the heterogeneity and fluorescence of the sample could be unfavorable for Raman analysis (785 nm), since saffron samples and plant adulterants were identified separately; however, successful discrimination was not observed between each plant sample: marigold, safflower, and turmeric (Varliklioz, Eksi‐Kocak, Yetim, & Boyaci, ). FT‐Raman (1064 nm) was, however, used successfully ( R 2 = 0.93) to quantify the content of metanil yellow in turmeric at concentrations of adulterant higher than 1% (Dhakal et al., ).…”
Section: Nontargeted Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varliklioz et al [ 132 ] compared three spectroscopic techniques (ATR-FTIR, Raman, and LIBS) to classify pure saffron and adulterated samples with safflower, calendula, or turmeric. PCA analysis showed that the ATR-FTIR technique achieved better discrimination results between pure saffron and plant adulterants compared with Raman; nevertheless, the best inter-class classification results were obtained with the laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS).…”
Section: Ft-mir Spectroscopy Applications In Coffee Cocoa and High-pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%