2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel prokaryotic diversity in sediments of Tunisian multipond solar saltern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Deltaproteobacterium OTU (PB-86) showed only modest similarity (96%) with an environmental clone found in the Guerrero Negro solar salterns [22] and was not closely related to cultured members of this subphylum (>15% similar to cultured Deltaproteobacterial species). Recovering of sulphate-reducing lineages from Deltaproteobacterium has been already reported for hypersaline environments [22,33].…”
Section: Salt Composition Of Watermentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Deltaproteobacterium OTU (PB-86) showed only modest similarity (96%) with an environmental clone found in the Guerrero Negro solar salterns [22] and was not closely related to cultured members of this subphylum (>15% similar to cultured Deltaproteobacterial species). Recovering of sulphate-reducing lineages from Deltaproteobacterium has been already reported for hypersaline environments [22,33].…”
Section: Salt Composition Of Watermentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Aside from a clear separation from the monimolimnion assemblages, the communities also showed a vertical variation. As the samples from 0.5 and 2 m depths were mainly dominated by Halobacteriaceae reads, related to an environmentally derived DNA sequence from a solar saltern (Baati et al, 2010), the 3 m depth sample contained a high abundance of reads belonging to the MSP41 group (~47.7%). Moreover, a V4 SSU rDNA phylogenetic tree suggested that the 3 m community consists of OTUs related to candidate genera Nanosalinarum, Nanosalina and Haloredivivus (Supplementary Figure S3) (Ghai et al, 2011;Narasingarao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methanogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogenetic diversity and community structure of members of the Halobacteriales have been investigated in various thalassohaline (e.g., crystallizer ponds in solar salterns [3,42,45]) and athalasohaline (e.g., the Dead Sea and soda lakes [46]) water bodies. In such hypersaline habitats (Ͼ25% NaCl), members of the Halobacteriales often represent the dominant microbial fraction observed, and hence their diversity could readily be examined using general archaeal 16S rRNA gene primers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such hypersaline habitats (Ͼ25% NaCl), members of the Halobacteriales often represent the dominant microbial fraction observed, and hence their diversity could readily be examined using general archaeal 16S rRNA gene primers. Collectively, these studies have indicated that while low overlap between communities in seemingly similar habitats (e.g., solar salterns) is often observed, Halobacteriales diversity in such habitats is often limited (3,8,45), with a single or few phylotypes often representing the majority of the Halobacteriales community within such ecosystems. Further, while 16S rRNA gene sequences belonging to putatively novel Halobacteriales genera have been identified in some of these studies (see, e.g., reference 45), the majority of halophilic Archaea identified in such habitats belong to various wellcharacterized Halobacteriales genera, e.g., Halorubrum, Haloferax, and Haloquadratum (3,8,45).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%