2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel preparation of enteric-coated chitosan-prednisolone conjugate microspheres and in vitro evaluation of their potential as a colonic delivery system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From such knowledge, PD-loaded microparticles have been developed using chitosan-suscinyl-predinisolone conjugate and enteric-coating polymer, Eudragit [23] [24]. Before now, Eudragit L-coated conjuagte microparticles (MP/EuL) were evaluated for pharmacological and pharmacokinetic features [25] [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From such knowledge, PD-loaded microparticles have been developed using chitosan-suscinyl-predinisolone conjugate and enteric-coating polymer, Eudragit [23] [24]. Before now, Eudragit L-coated conjuagte microparticles (MP/EuL) were evaluated for pharmacological and pharmacokinetic features [25] [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of these parameters were investigated by many researchers. For instance, the sonication power usually controls the particle size (Kabir, Saha, & Jeelani, 2007;Kang et al, 2006;Oosegi, Onishi, & Machida, 2008).…”
Section: Microparticle Size and Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro release studies revealed that no SD was released at the gastric pH; however, when the microsphere reached the colonic environment, a continuous release was observed for a variable time (8-12 h). In a similar study, Onishi et al prepared Eudragit®-coated microspheres composed of chitosan-succinylprednisolone conjugates (Ch-SP) using the sonication method [38]. These authors demonstrated that Eudragit®-coated microspheres protected the Ch-SP microspheres from morphological changes at pH 1.2, and regenerated them at pH 6.8 and 7.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%