2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel NSP1 genotype characterised in an African camel G8P[11] rotavirus strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…RVA genomic classification studies have revealed the emergence of novel or unusual RVAs carrying several novel gene segments or genotype constellations (Abe et al, 2011; Esona et al, 2010; Jere et al, 2014; Matthijnssens et al, 2011; Papp et al, 2012; Trojnar et al, 2013; Yinda et al, 2016). In this study, we identified and characterized a RVA strain with an unusual genotype constellation and carrying eight recently assigned novel gene segments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RVA genomic classification studies have revealed the emergence of novel or unusual RVAs carrying several novel gene segments or genotype constellations (Abe et al, 2011; Esona et al, 2010; Jere et al, 2014; Matthijnssens et al, 2011; Papp et al, 2012; Trojnar et al, 2013; Yinda et al, 2016). In this study, we identified and characterized a RVA strain with an unusual genotype constellation and carrying eight recently assigned novel gene segments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rotavirus Classification Working Group (RCWG) has devised a complete genotype classification system, defining the genotype constellation of RVAs as follows: Gx-P[ x ]-Ix-Rx-Cx-Mx-Ax-Nx-Tx-Ex-Hx, representing VP7-VP4-VP6-VP1-VP2-VP3-NSP1-NSP2-NSP3-NSP4-NSP5 (Matthijnssens et al, 2011). To date, 35 G, 50 P, 26 I, 21 R, 19C, 19 M, 30 A, 20 N, 21 T, 26 E and 21H genotypes have been identified in human and non-human hosts and classified based on differences in the nucleotide sequence identities of each encoding gene segment, respectively (Abe et al, 2011; Esona et al, 2010; Estes and Greenberg, 2013; Guo et al, 2012; Jere et al, 2014; Matthijnssens et al, 2011; Papp et al, 2012; Trojnar et al, 2013; Yinda et al, 2016), http://rega.kuleuven.be/cev/viralmetagenomics/virus-classification). This classification system has accelerated the comparison of RVA genotypes and increased our understanding of the genetic diversity of RVA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While GH018-08 was closely related (96.1% nucleotide sequence identity) to the human-artiodactyl interspecies reassortant strain RVA/Human-wt/BEL/B1711/2002/G6P[6] [49], its next closest neighbour (91.8% nucleotide sequence identity) was the caprine strain RVA/Goat-tc/BGD/GO34/1999/G6P[1] [50]. GH018-08 was distantly related (90.2–91.6% nucleotide sequence identities) to other contemporary human strains of the same genotype, as well as the recently reported camel strain RVA/Camel-wt/SDN/MRC-DPRU447/2002/G8P[11] [51] (90.8% nucleotide sequence identity) (Figure 2, Tables S3, S4). However, GH019-08 was closely related (99.1–99.2% nucleotide sequence identity) to the contemporary human strains RVA/Human-wt/BEL/F01498/2009/G3P6, RVA/Human-wt/BEL/F01322/2009/G3P[6] and RVA/Human-wt/USA/06-242/2006/G2P[6] [52], as well as other recent human strains (97.3–98.2% nucleotide sequence identity), including many of African origin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NSP3 genes of strains HMG035 and NGRBg8 showed complete nucleotide sequence identity (100%), and the maximum nucleotide sequence identity (98.3%) with the NSP3 gene of Ghanaian bovine-like human strain Ghan-059 (G8P[1]), and somewhat lower identity (95.5%) with Italian bovine-like human strain PA169 (G6P[14]) (Matthijnssens et al, 2008a). On phylogenetic analysis, strains HMG035 and NGRBg8 were found to be closely related with strain Ghan-059 in a common branch with strain PA169 and Sudanese bovine-like camel strain MRC-DPRU447 (G8P[11]) (Jere et al, 2014) (Fig. 1i).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%