2021
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel nanohybrids for effervescence enhanced magnetic solid‐phase microextraction of wide‐polarity organic pollutants in roasted meat samples

Abstract: To simultaneously and efficiently extract pollutants with differential polarities, we herein fabricated and characterized a multifunctional nanocomposite. The novel nanohybrids used NiFe2O4 as magnetic cores, and NH2‐MIL‐101(Al), β‐cyclodextrin and graphene oxide as functional components combined with magnetic cores. With the aid of graphene oxide's large π‐conjugated system, NH2‐MIL‐101(Al)’s strong adsorption to moderately/strongly polar chemicals, and β‐cyclodextrin's specific recognition effect, the nanohy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the food samples have been extracted by organic solvents and dispersed in water, the extraction procedures are similar to those in water samples. The hollow fiber solid-phase microextraction (HF-SPME) and DMSPME , are appropriate for the enrichment of target analytes, except for the widely used SPME fiber and IT-SPME. These extraction forms have demonstrated effective enrichment efficiencies toward organic analytes from diverse food samples.…”
Section: Spme In Food Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the food samples have been extracted by organic solvents and dispersed in water, the extraction procedures are similar to those in water samples. The hollow fiber solid-phase microextraction (HF-SPME) and DMSPME , are appropriate for the enrichment of target analytes, except for the widely used SPME fiber and IT-SPME. These extraction forms have demonstrated effective enrichment efficiencies toward organic analytes from diverse food samples.…”
Section: Spme In Food Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPLC is one of the most widely used methods for detecting BPs [25–27], particularly when coupled with MS [28]. Li et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPLC is one of the most widely used methods for detecting BPs [25][26][27], particularly when coupled with MS [28]. Li et al reported using β-cyclodextrin polymer as the sorbent for solid phase extraction, HPLC with an ultraviolet detector (UV) could achieve analysis of BPA, BPF, and BPAF in water samples and orange juice with limits of detection (LODs) of 0.15 ng/ml [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several analytical approaches have been reported for BP quantification, such as solid-phase microextraction(SPME) [10], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [9,11], and effervescent tablet-assisted dispersive solid-phase microextraction (ET-DSM) [8,12,13]. The ET-DSM method incorporating an effervescent reaction, as pioneered by Lasarte-Aragones and coworkers, is often a preferred method owing to its convenient operation and remote/outdoor feasibility [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the ET-DSM method integrates with magnetic recovery to construct the ET-MSPE procedure, which employs an external magnet to separate adsorbent/extractant after extraction to avoid extra steps such as centrifugation, further improving the efficiency of sample pretreatment. Given its operational efficiencies, ET-MSPE approaches have rapidly developed for the detection of trace pollutants, including pesticides [14,15], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [16,17], and BPs [8,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%