2018
DOI: 10.1177/2050640618785078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel lumen‐apposing metal stent for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: An Italian multicentre experience

Abstract: Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is the procedure of choice for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) management. Recently developed lumen-apposing fully covered self-expandable metal stents (LAMSs) may facilitate drainage, especially of necrotic and complex PFCs. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a newly developed LAMS (Nagi, Taiwong Medical Co. Ltd, South Korea) in the drainage of PFCs. Methods: Retrospective analysis of LAMS drainage of PFCs from seven centres. Patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, plastic stents have proven significantly less effective overall in the setting of WON (as opposed to pancreatic pseudocyst) due to their small calibers. Metal stents are now increasingly used for draining WON endoscopically, despite current controversial reports ( vs plastic stents)[ 8 - 13 ], and the sparseness of pertinent long-term data. Furthermore, certain complications of stenting, namely delayed bleeding, stent migration, and jaundice-producing biliary strictures, have occurred significantly more often when using metal ( vs plastic) stents, especially > 3 wk after intervention[ 13 - 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, plastic stents have proven significantly less effective overall in the setting of WON (as opposed to pancreatic pseudocyst) due to their small calibers. Metal stents are now increasingly used for draining WON endoscopically, despite current controversial reports ( vs plastic stents)[ 8 - 13 ], and the sparseness of pertinent long-term data. Furthermore, certain complications of stenting, namely delayed bleeding, stent migration, and jaundice-producing biliary strictures, have occurred significantly more often when using metal ( vs plastic) stents, especially > 3 wk after intervention[ 13 - 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 2018 Korea NA NA Prospective 5 4 1 Nagi 29 0/5 6 10 Maria et al. 26 2018 Italy 2013–2016 7 Retrospective 67 23 44 Nagi 59 21/46 8 11 Rajat et al. 27 2019 US 2014–2017 1 Retrospective 27 15 12 AXIOS 54 15/12 7 12 This center NA China 2016–2019 1 Retrospective 12 10 2 AXIOS and DMHS 47 4/8 NA a The age derived from Sujievvan et al was median age, and ages derived from other studies were mean ages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study from Varadarajulu et al 30 in favor of our ndings also showed clinical success was signi cantly higher for PPC and pancreatic abscess compared to WON. This may be explained by the fact that WON containing varying amounts of necrotic uid and solid debris, comparing to PPC with minimal or no necrosis, has lower response rate to EUS-guided drainage and higher risk of complications, such as stent occlusion and stent migration 11,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%