2018
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2850056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Formulation and Resolution of Job-Shop Scheduling Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…f) The Objective function Following [6], [7], the objective function to be minimized is the total weighted tardiness. The tardiness of part i is the number of time slots being late, i.e., the number of time slots that the completion time of the last operation of part i exceeds the due date di.…”
Section: E) Machine Capacity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f) The Objective function Following [6], [7], the objective function to be minimized is the total weighted tardiness. The tardiness of part i is the number of time slots being late, i.e., the number of time slots that the completion time of the last operation of part i exceeds the due date di.…”
Section: E) Machine Capacity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the scheduling problem with a single-operation part with p = 3 and K = 8 in used in Subsection III-C. Constraints (2), (3), (5) and (11) in Fig. 7 have been explored in Subsection III-C, and inequality (12) is redundant given the binary requirements of .…”
Section: Example 1: Single Part A) One Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(25b) -(25e). This set of constraints has been reported in our previous work [5]. The above set of tightened constraints can be generalized for all operations with different processing time as follows,…”
Section: ) Inequality Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations