2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel dynamic formulations for real-time ride-sharing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in the light of the discussion in the previous work (Najmi et al 2017), which focused on the peer-topeer ridesharing problem, i.e., the matching between riders and drivers, we can make the following observations. In Najmi et al (2017), for instance M 1, on the global run, a total of 25550 drivers are attempted to be matched with a total of 20250 riders, that is on average 57 vehicles available and 45 requests per batch of 2 min. As the average trip duration is observed to be of 16 min, therefore 8 batch periods, it would take respectively 600{8 " 75 and 800{8 " 100 vehicles per batch of 2 min to satisfy the demand (up to respectively 76% and 96%) on average considering on-demand ridesharing, which is an explanation of the low matching rate presented in Najmi et al (2017).…”
Section: Melbourne Metropolitan Area Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in the light of the discussion in the previous work (Najmi et al 2017), which focused on the peer-topeer ridesharing problem, i.e., the matching between riders and drivers, we can make the following observations. In Najmi et al (2017), for instance M 1, on the global run, a total of 25550 drivers are attempted to be matched with a total of 20250 riders, that is on average 57 vehicles available and 45 requests per batch of 2 min. As the average trip duration is observed to be of 16 min, therefore 8 batch periods, it would take respectively 600{8 " 75 and 800{8 " 100 vehicles per batch of 2 min to satisfy the demand (up to respectively 76% and 96%) on average considering on-demand ridesharing, which is an explanation of the low matching rate presented in Najmi et al (2017).…”
Section: Melbourne Metropolitan Area Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This method handles more than 10k taxis per day and roughly 500k trips. In Najmi et al (2017), a cluster-based matching algorithm, based on trip spatial features, is run prior to running the assignment problem to match drivers and riders. Instances with hundreds of vehicles in the Melbourne Metropolitan Area can be solved in real-time in a rolling horizon framework.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic ride-matching includes many parameters, and this renders the problem to be non-deterministic polynomial-time hard (NP-hard) [15][16][17]. Therefore, many solutions to the ride-matching problem that have been proposed in the literature use either heuristics or metaheuristics [6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Although heuristic and meta-heuristic methods offer feasible processing times, they may not find the best possible matches.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in partial spatial coverage, the coexistence of several non-interoperable systems, "trial and error" pilot tests, etc. Policy-makers should encourage city-wide systems, based on an in-depth analysis of the global users' needs and boundary conditions of the service area [75]. In addition, two facts could impede the desired reduction of the vehicle fleet by the introduction of car-sharing initiatives.…”
Section: Sharing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%