1978
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.56.5_466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on the Turbulence Closure Model for Atmospheric Boundary Layers

Abstract: A turbulence closure model for atmospheric boundary layers is examined, under the assumption that the turbulent flow is steady in its ensemble average and the advection and diffusion terms in the turbulent Reynolds stress and heat flux equations are neglected. The constants which are introduced in order to obtain a closure system are determined referring the experimental results obtained in the wind tunnel. The validity of the closure model thus obtained is checked referring the observational results obtained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures are cross sections fromm north to south through Himeji (the central city of this area). The configuration is relatively 2-dimensional around Himeji ( by Gambo (1978), and mean slope angle is 0.6*. From hT= 3.5R1/12 we obtain hT=24.9 (daytime) and hT= 74.1 (night) so that for the daytime we have R1/4sin*5=3.8<hT=24.9 and for night R1/4sin* =99.5>hT=74.1.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These figures are cross sections fromm north to south through Himeji (the central city of this area). The configuration is relatively 2-dimensional around Himeji ( by Gambo (1978), and mean slope angle is 0.6*. From hT= 3.5R1/12 we obtain hT=24.9 (daytime) and hT= 74.1 (night) so that for the daytime we have R1/4sin*5=3.8<hT=24.9 and for night R1/4sin* =99.5>hT=74.1.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…N01, after determining the other closure constants, chose the value of C 3 in order that the slope of the dimensionless gradient function f h for heat approaches 4.7 as z ! y (Businger et al 1971), where C 2 was selected to be 0.65 following Gambo (1978). If C 2 is selected to be 0.75, however, C 3 becomes 0.352 and falls within the range of the previous studies.…”
Section: Closure Constants In the Mynn Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although most of the previous e¤orts to improve the MY model focused on excluding singular solutions (e.g., Mellor and Yamada 1982;Galperin et al 1988;Helfand and Labraga 1988;Gerrity et al 1994;Janjić 2002), several authors did attempt to improve the problems described above (e.g., Gambo 1978;Sun and Ogura 1980;Kantha and Clayson 1994;Cheng et al 2002). Using a database of a large-eddy simulation (LES) for dry ABLs under di¤erent stratifications, Nakanishi (2001, hereafter N01) recently proposed an improved MY model in which a newly-proposed diagnostic equation for the turbulent length scale and reevaluated model constants are incorporated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulent diffusion coefficients (K m , K h , and K q ) in Eqs. (1) to (4) are obtained from Gambo's (1978) formula. F u and F v denote Coriolis parameters.…”
Section: Brief Description Of CMmentioning
confidence: 99%