1984
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.62.2_224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Difference of the Slope Wind Between Day and Night

Abstract: The response of the fluid stably stratified over the infinite slope was investigated by linear theory when finite length 2l in it was heated or cooled. If the angle of the slope was small, the nature of the flow near the slope changed depending on whether the half height of the slope h*S=lsin * (* is angle of slope) was higher than that of thermal boundary layer h*T=a(*/N)1/3l1/3 (**3.5), which was developed over the heat island whose length was 2l, or not.On the real slope h*s>h*T was often satisfied at night… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wind inland was a little stronger at the places where the mountains were located closer to the coastline, which was the same feature pointed out by Asai and Mitsumoto (1978). From the results of the linear theory on the slope wind (Asai and Mitsumoto, 1978;Kondo, 1984;Niino and Kondo, 1989), there was little difference in the phase between surface heating and up-slope ' wind when the slope angle (cr) satisfied the relation, a» w/N. Here, w is the frequency of diurnal variation and N is the Brunt-Vaisala frequency.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The wind inland was a little stronger at the places where the mountains were located closer to the coastline, which was the same feature pointed out by Asai and Mitsumoto (1978). From the results of the linear theory on the slope wind (Asai and Mitsumoto, 1978;Kondo, 1984;Niino and Kondo, 1989), there was little difference in the phase between surface heating and up-slope ' wind when the slope angle (cr) satisfied the relation, a» w/N. Here, w is the frequency of diurnal variation and N is the Brunt-Vaisala frequency.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The presence of nonlinear terms involved with the evaluation of the L WR flux divergence prevents a simplified analytical solution for Equation (1); some authors have even neglected the L WR flux divergence term (e.g., Rao and Snodgrass, 1981;Kondo, 1984). However, in order to overcome this limitation, a diagnostic equation of 8 can be established which is based upon observational data for 8, and so, indirectly, includes the contributions from long-wave radiative flux divergence terms to 8.…”
Section: Analytical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eddy-viscosity concept has led to useful qualitative descriptions of a variety of turbulent geophysical flows including atmospheric Ekman layers (Clarke, 1970;Houghton, 1977;Lettau, 1983), oceanic Ekman layers (Price et al, 1987;Chereskin, 1995;Ralph and Niiler, 1999), sea breezes (Walsh, 1974;Sun and Orlanski, 1981), and anabatic and katabatic flows (Defant, 1949;Egger, 1981;Kondo, 1984;Papadopoulos et al, 1997;Oerlemans, 1998). However, despite the successes of some appropriately tuned models based on the eddy-viscosity concept, it should always be borne in mind that eddy viscosity is a rather ad hoc concept.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%