1952
DOI: 10.1086/145631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on the Theory of the Stark Effect in Stellar Spectra.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…86 Similarly, Cato argues that there is 'no compelling reason why in the public interest a secondary party to a joint enterprise should be at a greater risk of conviction for murder than a person who actually kills' . 87 In a similar vein, Bronitt and McSherry state that 'regrettably, while common purpose is regarded as a form of accessorial liability, there has been limited consideration by Australian courts of the lack of symmetry between the fault required for accessorial liability by aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring and common purpose'.…”
Section: [Emphasis Added]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86 Similarly, Cato argues that there is 'no compelling reason why in the public interest a secondary party to a joint enterprise should be at a greater risk of conviction for murder than a person who actually kills' . 87 In a similar vein, Bronitt and McSherry state that 'regrettably, while common purpose is regarded as a form of accessorial liability, there has been limited consideration by Australian courts of the lack of symmetry between the fault required for accessorial liability by aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring and common purpose'.…”
Section: [Emphasis Added]mentioning
confidence: 99%