2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.03.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on the cost of the approximate controllability for the heat equation with potential

Abstract: We prove the approximate controllability for the heat equation with potential with a cost of order e c/ε when the target is in H 1 0 (Ω) with a precision in L 2 (Ω) norm. Also a quantification estimate of the unique continuation for initial data in L 2 (Ω) of the heat equation with potential is established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of obtaining explicit bounds on C(T, u 0 ) received much consideration in the literature (see, for example, [18,12,37,44,33,32,34,10,31]), especially the case of small time, i.e. when T goes to zero.…”
Section: Application To Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of obtaining explicit bounds on C(T, u 0 ) received much consideration in the literature (see, for example, [18,12,37,44,33,32,34,10,31]), especially the case of small time, i.e. when T goes to zero.…”
Section: Application To Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it turns out that the problem is closely related to the notion of cost of controllability in the control theory literature. Thus we will use ideas from [Ro95], [Ph04] in order to pass from quantitative uniqueness to the required form of quantitative approximation. Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In the next section of this paper, we will show such controllability by building up a new type of observability inequality.) The cost of the null controllability and the approximate controllability for heat equations have been extensively studied (see [10,24,9]). It is acknowledged that the order e C T for the upper bound of the cost for controls is sharp in some sense (see [9]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%