2003
DOI: 10.1093/arbitration/19.2.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on Societe Generale de Surveillance SA v. Pakistan, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a case involving the Geneva Convention and Protocol on Arbitration Clauses, the Supreme Court of Pakistan stated that international treaties and arrangements are only recognized and enforced by the courts in Pakistan if they are incorporated into the country's laws. The Supreme Court of Pakistan's ruling upheld the same legal reasoning "in the case of Société Générale de Surveillance Pakistan, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance", mentioned "a Treaty unless [it] was incorporated into the laws of the Country by a Statute, the Courts would have no power to enforce treaty rights and obligations arising therefrom at the behest of an individual or State" ("Société Générale de Surveillance SA v. Pakistan)", (Lau, 2003).…”
Section: Practice and Legal Theory In The Context Of Pakistanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case involving the Geneva Convention and Protocol on Arbitration Clauses, the Supreme Court of Pakistan stated that international treaties and arrangements are only recognized and enforced by the courts in Pakistan if they are incorporated into the country's laws. The Supreme Court of Pakistan's ruling upheld the same legal reasoning "in the case of Société Générale de Surveillance Pakistan, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance", mentioned "a Treaty unless [it] was incorporated into the laws of the Country by a Statute, the Courts would have no power to enforce treaty rights and obligations arising therefrom at the behest of an individual or State" ("Société Générale de Surveillance SA v. Pakistan)", (Lau, 2003).…”
Section: Practice and Legal Theory In The Context Of Pakistanmentioning
confidence: 99%