Nota Introdutória: Critérios de Avaliação de Artigos de Investigação Qualitativa em Educação

Costa, António Pedro; Souza, Francislê Neri de; Souza, Dayse Neri de

doi:10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle36.04

Cited by 12 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the initial objectives for the development of the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool (QRe Tool) (8) was to allow the CIAIQ's coordinator to move forward in improving the evaluation tool and to apply it in the evaluation process of the Congress itself. Moreover, in a more general view, "the aim of these tools is to improve the transparency of aspects of qualitative research by providing clear models for reporting research.…”

Section: Methods Methodological Design Criteria and Validation Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sometimes this challenge is the same when a senior researcher writes their first article on Qualitative Research. We are talking about a rather diffuse area, which led some authors to propose checklists to help researchers write their papers with the best structure (3) . These tools which served as a basis for defining the criteria: 1) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ), consisting of 32 divided items (4) ; 2) Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR), with 21 items (5) ; 3) Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) also with 21 items (6) ; 4) Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP), which has several checklists, highlighting the Systematic Review Checklist and the Qualitative Research Checklist, both with 10 items each (7) .…”

Section: Qualitative Studies Assessment Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers

Costa

Minayo

2019

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To present some criteria, many of which were created in the form of a checklist of items to be considered throughout the review process. Furthermore, we present a study whose main objective was to build (and validate) a review instrument by specialists that is clear, comprehensive, concise and consistent with the highest standards of excellence. Method: We use a survey to collect data (123 answers). To analyze the open answers we use the technique of content analysis through the Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Results: Besides the creation of new criteria with a focus on methodological dimensions based on 12 items, the involvement of the Ibero-American Congress on Qualitative Research scientific committee in the validation of this instrument. Conclusion: This option, in line with the others described, will allow to implement improvements to the editions of the events using the Qualitative Research Evaluation Tool in 2018.

show abstract

Section: Methods Methodological Design Criteria and Validation Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Qualitative Studies Assessment Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers

Costa

Minayo

2019

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…La literatura recoge distintas posiciones respecto al uso de criterios de calidad en la IC: la replicación de criterios convencionales, la aplicación de criterios paralelos o cuasi-fundacionales, la búsqueda de criterios propios, y el no considerar criterios de calidad comunes (Varela & Vives, 2016;Garside, 2014;Sandin, 2000). Así, se encuentra diversidad de criterios para evaluar la calidad (Mandal, 2018;Costa, Souza & Souza, 2017;Varela & Vives, 2016;Santiago-Delefosse, Gavin, Bruchez, Roux & Stephen, 2016;Patton, 2015;Lub, 2015;entre otros). Todo ello, muestra el poco consenso que existe aún en la comunidad científica sobre si debe haber o no criterios de calidad y sobre cuáles serían ellos.…”

Section: Palabras Claveunclassified

Las estrategias para asegurar la calidad de la investigación cualitativa. El caso de los artículos publicados en revistas de educación

Díaz-Bazo¹

2019

RLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of qualitative research in Social Sciences and particularly in Education has required that it be legitimized in the face of positivist research showing its rigor in the construction of knowledge. Ensuring validity, reliability and objectivity require strategies that are particular to the nature of qualitative research, all of which should be made visible to the readers. This article presents a documentary study that explores how qualitative research considers criteria and strategies to ensure its quality. The corpus of its analysis consisted of 60 articles published in 2017 in five Education journals in Latin America. The results show that most of them (85%) do not specify which strategies they use for their results to comply with the criteria of reflexivity, credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability. The strategies to ensure reflexivity and credibility such as a reference to the position of the researcher, triangulation, a review from other researchers and the return to the participants are seldom used. These data invite a reflection on the need to explain such criteria in order to demonstrate the value and integrity of qualitative research.Les stratégies pour assurer la qualité de la recherche qualitative. Le cas des articles publiés dans les Revues Spécialisés en Éducation Résumé: L'utilisation de la recherche qualitative dans les Sciences sociales, et en particulier, dans le domaine des Sciences de l'Éducation, a dû faire preuve de légitimité face à la recherche positiviste en démontrant sa rigueur dans la construction de la connaissance. Garantir la validité, fiabilité et objectivité requiert des stratégies particulières à la nature de la recherche qualitative, celles qui devraient être rendue visibles aux lecteurs. Cet article présent une étude documentaire qui explore comment les recherches qualitatives prennent en compte des critères et des stratégies pour assurer sa qualité. Le corpus de l'analyse a été constitué par 60 articles publiés l'année 2017 dans cinq revues d'Éducation en Amérique Latine. Les résultats montrent que la plupart de celles-ci (85%) n'expliquent pas les stratégies utilisées pour que ses résultats répondent aux critères de réflexivité, crédibilité, transférabilité, dépendance et confirmation. Les stratégies pour assurer la réflexivité et la crédibilité telles que la référence à la position de l'enquêteur, la triangulation des données, la révision par d'autres chercheurs et le retour aux participants sont très peu utilisées. Ces données-ci invitent à réfléchir sur la nécessité d'expliciter les critères pour démontrer la valeur et l'intégrité de la recherche qualitative.Mots clés: recherche qualitative; critères de qualité; stratégies de qualité; recherche en sciences sociales; étude documentaire Estratégias para garantir a qualidade da pesquisa qualitativa. O caso dos artigos publicados em revistas de educação

show abstract

“…O questionário consistiu em 4 perguntas fechadas e 2 perguntas abertas. No total, foram recebidas 339 respostas (Costa et al, 2017). Neste contexto, os critérios de avaliação foram reformulados, discutidos e melhorados, sendo constituídos atualmente por 12 itens (Quadro 1).…”

unclassified

“…Neste contexto, os critérios de avaliação foram reformulados, discutidos e melhorados, sendo constituídos atualmente por 12 itens (Quadro 1). O modelo foi designado por Critérios de Construção e Avaliação de Artigos em Investigação Qualitativa (CCAAIQ) (Costa & Souza, 2017 Relativamente à Fundamentação Teórica, a questão base pretende aferir se a mesma é atualizada e articulada com o tema ou objetivos do estudo. As duas questões norteadoras questionam os revisores sobre "Quantos autores internacionais são citados como base do trabalho?"…”

unclassified