Not just tea and biscuits; the Gold Coast Primary Health Network process of designing, implementing and operating a Community Advisory Council

McClean, Jessica; Trigger, Kellie

doi:10.1071/py16157

Cited by 6 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CAGs are one mechanism of incorporating CCE in health and medical research and health service delivery (McClean and Trigger, 2017;Stewart et al, 2019). The purpose, structure and responsibilities of CAGs vary depending on the expected contribution to a project or organisation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In general, a Community Advisory Group (CAG) consists of community members working with organisation representatives to provide community and consumer perspectives (McClean and Trigger, 2017;Stewart et al, 2019). In health and medical services and research, CAGs have been; involved in individual research projects (Synnot et al, 2018;Mlambo et al, 2019), provided overarching advice at the institutional or organisational level (Gunatillake et al, 2020), and guided improvements to health service delivery (McClean and Trigger, 2017). The purpose, structure and responsibilities of CAGs vary considerably based on the rationale for their implementation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Community input in a genomic health implementation program: Perspectives of a community advisory group

Vidgen

Cutler

Bean³

et al. 2022

Front. Genet.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consumer and community engagement (CCE) in the implementation of genomics into health services and associated research is needed to ensure that changes benefit the affected patients. Queensland Genomics was a program to implement genomics into a public health service. We describe its Community Advisory Group’s (CAG) structure and function and provide recommendations based on the CAG members’ perspectives. The CAG provided advice to the Queensland Genomics program and its projects in an advisory capacity. The CAG was also resourced to develop and lead community-focused activities. Key enablers for CAG included; diversity of CAG members’ skills and experience, adequate resourcing, and the CAG’s ability to self-determine their direction. The CAG experienced limitations due to a lack of mechanisms to implement CCE in the Program’s projects. Here, we provide insights and commentary on this CAG, which will be useful for other initiatives seeking to undertake CCE in genomic research and health care.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community input in a genomic health implementation program: Perspectives of a community advisory group

Vidgen

Cutler

Bean³

et al. 2022

Front. Genet.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is a growing awareness of the importance of including people with dementia and care‐partners in research; however, the lack of information on how to include them poses a challenge to researchers 18–20 . The co‐design research process focussing on consumer involvement in the practice and governance of the research utilised throughout the duration of our study provides an innovative model on how to successfully address this challenge.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Partnering with people with dementia and their care partners, aged care service experts, policymakers and academics: A co‐design process

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:To describe the co-design process in a project that "evaluated how the key worker role can best support people living with dementia in the community setting." Methods: People with dementia, care-partners, aged-care service experts, policymakers and academics utilised a co-design process to undertake a systematic literature review and a qualitative evaluation study. Results: The development of a successful co-design process that includes people living with dementia and their care-partners ("consumers") at all stages of the research process and addresses their individual needs. Conclusions: The co-design approach utilised in this project provided support, for consumers living in the community to be fully involved in the research design, conduct and plans for dissemination and implementation of the findings. Consequently, the research outcomes are based on solid evidence and consumer need. Additionally, a successful model for supporting consumers to facilitate their involvement in all aspects of the research process, was developed. K E Y W O R D Sco-design, consumers, dementia, qualitative research, support worker 54 | GOEMAN Et Al. How to cite this article: Goeman DP, Corlis M, Swaffer K, et al. Partnering with people with dementia and their care partners, aged care service experts, policymakers and academics: A co-design process.

show abstract

“…The majority of studies were expert opinions; two were descriptive studies, and one was a systematic review. For the synthesis tables, go to http://links.lww.com/AJN/A247 1, 2, 11-18. To follow is a summary of the evidence.…”

Section: Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Creating a Community Advisory Board

Zadvinskis

Hoying

2023

AJN, American Journal of Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Not just tea and biscuits; the Gold Coast Primary Health Network process of designing, implementing and operating a Community Advisory Council

Cited by 6 publications

References 15 publications

Community input in a genomic health implementation program: Perspectives of a community advisory group

Community input in a genomic health implementation program: Perspectives of a community advisory group

Partnering with people with dementia and their care partners, aged care service experts, policymakers and academics: A co‐design process

Creating a Community Advisory Board

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About