2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norwegian version of the Nutritional Form for the Elderly: sufficient psychometric properties for performing institutional screening of elderly patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
54
3
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
54
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between the test and retest across items showed that five items had moderate agreement, seven items had substantial agreement and three items had almost perfect agreement, according to Landis and Koch (24) and Zou (25) , who indicated that an ICC in the range of 0·00-0·20 represents slight agreement; 0·21-0·40 represents fair agreement; 0·41-0·60 represents moderate agreement; 0·61-0·80 represents substantial agreement; and 0·81-1·00 represents almost perfect agreement. A rather similar agreement was obtained in a test-retest of the Norwegian version of the NUFFE using the weighted κ (13) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agreement between the test and retest across items showed that five items had moderate agreement, seven items had substantial agreement and three items had almost perfect agreement, according to Landis and Koch (24) and Zou (25) , who indicated that an ICC in the range of 0·00-0·20 represents slight agreement; 0·21-0·40 represents fair agreement; 0·41-0·60 represents moderate agreement; 0·61-0·80 represents substantial agreement; and 0·81-1·00 represents almost perfect agreement. A rather similar agreement was obtained in a test-retest of the Norwegian version of the NUFFE using the weighted κ (13) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The Swedish (10,11) , Norwegian (13) and Hungarian versions (14) of NUFFE have been tested in terms of their reliability and validity among older hospital patients, and the Norwegian version (15,16) has also been tested among older home-dwelling people. The results have shown sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of these versions in order to be used as a screening instrument (10,11,(13)(14)(15)(16) . However, there is no Chinese version, so there is a need to translate NUFFE into Simplified Chinese and to test its reliability and validity, so as to obtain a convenient nutritional screening instrument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NUFFE er validert for bruk på fleire språk i tillegg til på norsk Söderhamn et al, 2009;Gombos, Kertèscz, Csikos & Prohàszka, 2008). Vi kjenner ikkje til i kor stor grad NUFFE er brukt her til lands utover prosjektet i USHT og studiane som er presentert for å utvikle kartleggingsverktøyet.…”
Section: Nuffeunclassified
“…Vi kjenner ikkje til i kor stor grad NUFFE er brukt her til lands utover prosjektet i USHT og studiane som er presentert for å utvikle kartleggingsverktøyet. For Söderhamn (2006;Söderhamn et al, 2009) som utarbeida NUFFE som si doktoravhandling i Sverige i 2006, var det sentralt å omgå utfordringane som knyter seg til den aldrande kroppen. NUFFE manglar difor kroppsmål til forskjell frå MNA og Ernaeringsjournal.…”
Section: Nuffeunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation