2009
DOI: 10.15388/scandinavisticavilnensis.2009.2.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norwegian Modal Verbs and Attitudinal Modality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for example, makes a broad division of modalities into two categories: those that contain an element of will and those that contain no element of will. According to Mikučionis (2012), a corresponding distinction has become conventional in modern linguistic literature on modality, although there is no consensus on the terminology. Most authors call the two modal domains non-epistemic and epistemic modality, while others prefer terms like deontic vs. epistemic, root vs. epistemic, root vs. non-root, or volitive vs. non-volitive modality.…”
Section: -Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for example, makes a broad division of modalities into two categories: those that contain an element of will and those that contain no element of will. According to Mikučionis (2012), a corresponding distinction has become conventional in modern linguistic literature on modality, although there is no consensus on the terminology. Most authors call the two modal domains non-epistemic and epistemic modality, while others prefer terms like deontic vs. epistemic, root vs. epistemic, root vs. non-root, or volitive vs. non-volitive modality.…”
Section: -Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%