2020
DOI: 10.5194/os-2020-15
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current along the Lofoten Escarpment

Abstract: Abstract. Observations from moored instruments are analyzed to describe the Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current at the Lofoten Escarpment. The data set covers a 14-month period from June 2016 to September 2017, and resolves the core of the current from 200 to 650 m depth, between the 650 m and 1500 m isobaths. The along-slope current, vertically averaged between 200 and 600 m depth has an annual cycle amplitude of 0.1 m s−1 with strongest currents in winter, and a temporal average of 0.15 m s−1. Higher frequency … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the wind stress curl in the Nordic Seas is predominantly positive, wind reversals can occasionally enhance exchange between the boundary and the interior of the Lofoten Basin and therefore enable crossovers between the slope and the front current. In addition to wind effects, the strong eddy variability near the Lofoten Islands provides a means for AW to enter the Lofoten Basin interior as well (Fer et al., 2020). The latter mechanism seems to be responsible for AW transport from the slope current to the interior at depth, whereas wind processes seem to steer the surface waters across the Vøring Plateau entering the Lofoten Basin from the south (Dugstad, Fer, et al., 2019).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the wind stress curl in the Nordic Seas is predominantly positive, wind reversals can occasionally enhance exchange between the boundary and the interior of the Lofoten Basin and therefore enable crossovers between the slope and the front current. In addition to wind effects, the strong eddy variability near the Lofoten Islands provides a means for AW to enter the Lofoten Basin interior as well (Fer et al., 2020). The latter mechanism seems to be responsible for AW transport from the slope current to the interior at depth, whereas wind processes seem to steer the surface waters across the Vøring Plateau entering the Lofoten Basin from the south (Dugstad, Fer, et al., 2019).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the GLORYS 12v1 product, the energy conversion rates between mean flow and eddy fields were analyzed. The baroclinic conversion rate (BC) and the barotropic conversion rate (BT) were used to estimate the energy conversion between the mean potential energy (MPE) and the eddy potential energy (EPE), inferring the trend of baroclinic instability of currents, and the energy conversion between the MKE and the EKE inferring the trend of mean current barotropic instability (Fer et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; von Appen et al., 2016). The energy conversion rates in both fields gave a solution to understand the transport barrier formation and disruption mechanisms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of the particle release was chosen based on the highest EKE and the most baroclinically unstable part off the continental slope region (Isachsen, 2015; Trodahl & Isachsen, 2018). Due to the eddy activities caused by the baroclinic instability, this region has been shown to have the strongest shelf‐ocean water and plankton exchange (Dong et al., 2021; Fer et al., 2020). The average number of particles contained in each grid cell of size 0.1 × 0.2° over a 12‐year period average number of particles (ANP) was used as an indicator of particle origin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%