2019
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2019.1650952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norway spruce bark thickness models based on log midspan diameter for use in mechanized forest harvesting in Czechia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even if the choice of equation used in determining volume of bark is a source of error 20 , bark factors with a focus on bark thickness are well studied and the performances of several equations for different tree species show good results 10 , 11 , 16 , 30 , 33 . Such bark thickness factors are for example used when harvesters estimate under-bark volumes from over-bark measurements 6 , 34 . In this study we analyzed the accuracy of bark volume estimation on discs under laboratory conditions and on logs under real world conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even if the choice of equation used in determining volume of bark is a source of error 20 , bark factors with a focus on bark thickness are well studied and the performances of several equations for different tree species show good results 10 , 11 , 16 , 30 , 33 . Such bark thickness factors are for example used when harvesters estimate under-bark volumes from over-bark measurements 6 , 34 . In this study we analyzed the accuracy of bark volume estimation on discs under laboratory conditions and on logs under real world conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fit of the linear functions to the CCT data was tested through the mean absolute error (the average absolute difference between the values predicted by the linear models and the CCT values; MAE), mean absolute percentage error (the average absolute difference between the linearly modeled values and the CCT values divided by the CCT value, multiplied by 100; MAPE), root mean square error (the square root of the average of squared errors; RMSE), mean bias error (the average difference between the predicted values predicted through the linear models and the CCT values; MBE), and mean percentage error (the average difference between the values predicted by the linear models and the CCT values divided by the mean CCT double bark thickness, multiplied by 100; MPE). The procedure was described in more detail for Norway spruce by Jankovský et al (2019).…”
Section: Construction Of Linear Function and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…insects, fungi) and abiotic (e.g. weather, fire, physical damage) environmental factors (Jankovský et al 2019). Its thickness and texture differ significantly from extremely rough to fine, depending on e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the Czech polynomial model cannot be input into the forest machine systems, thus presenting the need to either localize the methods from different countries or continue measuring all timber manually. To remedy this problem, Jankovský et al [51,52] have linearized the standard polynomial bark deduction models for all main species groups into the so-called LinBark function, thus enabling the use of automated timber scaling by harvester forest machine systems in Czechia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%