2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noroviruses in raw sewage, secondary effluents and reclaimed water produced by sand-anthracite filters and membrane bioreactor/reverse osmosis system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the unmatched results may be a reflection of underestimation over circulation of NoV GII.17. Sewage analysis is an important molecular surveillance tool to understand the genetic diversity of enteric viruses in a human population (La Rosa et al, 2017;Mabasa et al, 2015;Montazeri et al, 2015;Prado et al, 2018). WHO used sewage to monitor poliovirus circulation in communities worldwide as a part of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative with combining clinical surveillance (Benschop et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, the unmatched results may be a reflection of underestimation over circulation of NoV GII.17. Sewage analysis is an important molecular surveillance tool to understand the genetic diversity of enteric viruses in a human population (La Rosa et al, 2017;Mabasa et al, 2015;Montazeri et al, 2015;Prado et al, 2018). WHO used sewage to monitor poliovirus circulation in communities worldwide as a part of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative with combining clinical surveillance (Benschop et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, raw sewage may act as a valuable source to characterize the prevalence of enteric viruses in a human population. Accordingly, several studies have used raw sewage for molecular epidemiology as a source of information on the viruses circulation through the fecal-oral route (Fumian et al, 2019;La Rosa et al, 2017;Montazeri et al, 2015;Nenonen et al, 2008;Prado et al, 2018).…”
Section: Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activated carbon was selected because it is a material with a high degree of porosity and a high internal surface (Krahnstöver & Wintgens, 2018). The angular shape of anthracite is ideal retain the solids (Prado et al., 2019), and the zeolite material was chosen due to the fact that suspended or colloidal particles can be retained in its pores (Hosseini Hashemi et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral removal between 2 and 3 log10 has been reported for different types of viruses during membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment (Prado et al, 2019;Miura et al, 2018;Purnell et al, 2016). Other studies have reported Log removal of viral particles greater than 4 (Chaudhry et al, 2015;Kuo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Removal Of Coronavirus During Wastewater Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%