2001
DOI: 10.1002/eat.1070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norms, normality, and clinical significant change: Implications for the evaluation of treatment outcomes for eating disorders

Abstract: Neglecting differences in national norms can lead to substantial misinterpretation of empirical findings in the diagnosis of eating disorders and the evaluation of treatment outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, no further current norms with a same aged German population are available [27]. Considering other international norms neither seemed to appropriate as there is evidence that the use of norms from different nations might result in a misinterpretation of findings [42]. Fifth, the recruitment of the current sample was carried out in 2010 and we compared the observed EDI scores with a population-based sample published in 2005 [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unfortunately, no further current norms with a same aged German population are available [27]. Considering other international norms neither seemed to appropriate as there is evidence that the use of norms from different nations might result in a misinterpretation of findings [42]. Fifth, the recruitment of the current sample was carried out in 2010 and we compared the observed EDI scores with a population-based sample published in 2005 [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kordy, Percevic, and Martinovich (2001) have pointed out that country-and culture-specific differences should be recognized for comparison of research results from different countries. The development of country-specific standards was recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 Indeed, norms for this construct appear to vary across even culturally similar populations. 66,67 In addition to the cultural relevance of specific item content, response style 10 -which can also be culturally drivenmay have contributed to cross-population differences. A third advantage would be improved detection of NFP-AN in clinical and community settings by encouraging the use of screening instruments that do not require fat phobia for diagnosis.…”
Section: Modify or Eliminate Diagnostic Criterion Bmentioning
confidence: 99%