2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalizing XRF-scanner data: A cautionary note on the interpretation of high-resolution records from organic-rich lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
142
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The organic-rich intercalations (E1-E6) can clearly be seen on the PC 3 /PC 1 profile. This observation supports the results obtained by Löwemark et al (2011), who noted that Al-normalized Ti and Fe profiles correlate with the organic matter content of sediments. It should be noted that PC 3 represents Mg and Al ( Figure 5E); however Mg and Al data measured by ITRAX with Mo tube is not reliable, because Mg is out of the detection range and Al data generally have very low signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Identification Of Sedimentary Events and Chronologysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The organic-rich intercalations (E1-E6) can clearly be seen on the PC 3 /PC 1 profile. This observation supports the results obtained by Löwemark et al (2011), who noted that Al-normalized Ti and Fe profiles correlate with the organic matter content of sediments. It should be noted that PC 3 represents Mg and Al ( Figure 5E); however Mg and Al data measured by ITRAX with Mo tube is not reliable, because Mg is out of the detection range and Al data generally have very low signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Identification Of Sedimentary Events and Chronologysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…XRF-scan data of water-rich core sections, in particular, should be routinely compared to Cl intensities in a way comparable to checking the core surface for any disturbances, such as unevenness and presence of cracks or gaps (Löwemark et al 2011). If enhanced Cl levels correspond to simultaneous dips in the light elements (those with atom numbers from Al to Fe; see Table 1), then enhanced caution is needed.…”
Section: Comments and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray fluorescence core scanning was done on an AVAAT-ECH instrument at the ETH Zurich and with a spatial resolution of 200 µm. XRF core scanning is a fast, non-destructive technique which provides information about elemental variations directly from untreated sediment and reflects proportions of different minerogenic components (Löwemark et al, 2011). Among the various elements tested , and considering the geological setting of the catchment, we provide the Ca / Si ratio to distinguish between authigenic carbonate sedimentation from glacial face leaching, mostly comprising siliceous stones transported by the glacial tongue in the valley.…”
Section: Core Sampling and Sedimentologymentioning
confidence: 99%