“…12 By 1991, we expanded the prospective study of the clinical course of this disorder to 1016 affected individuals in 328 LQTS families. 13 Important findings from the Registry during the past decade have included the following: age-and sex-related differences in the clinical manifestations of LQTS 14 ; influence of pregnancy on the risk for cardiac events in LQTS 15 ; ECG T-wave patterns in genetically distinct forms of LQTS 16 ; clinical course of LQTS by genotype 17 ; the spectrum of mutations in LQTS genes 18 ; increased risk associated with mutations in the pore region of the hERG gene 19 ; role played by physical exercise, emotions, arousal, and rest/sleep as triggers and facilitators for syncope and sudden cardiac death in LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 20 -22 ; effectiveness of -blocker therapy, particularly in patients with LQT1 and LQT2 genotypes 23 ; potential gene-specific usefulness of sodium channel blockers (mexiletine and flecainide) in the treatment of patients with the LQT3 mutations 24,25 ; life-saving benefit from the implanted defibrillator in highrisk LQTS patients 26 ; and left cardiac sympathetic denervation in the management of high-risk LQTS patients. 27 We initially thought that the clinical benefit of left-sided sympathectomy might have come from either a correction of a hypothesized left-sided dominance of sympathetic innervation or, in the case of a yet undefined "myocardial abnormality" (subsequently found to be represented by the mutations in cardiac ion channel genes), from removal of an arrhythmogenic trigger.…”