2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Spinal Anatomy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related study (20) demonstrated that the clearance of the L 3–5 bilateral articular processes of an adult are on average 33.5, 40.1 and 47.4 mm, respectively. With the addition of a conventional resection of 1/3-1/2 inside the small joint for intra-operative decompression, the diameter of the general bone window is 14–18 mm and the area is 2.4–3.0 mm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A related study (20) demonstrated that the clearance of the L 3–5 bilateral articular processes of an adult are on average 33.5, 40.1 and 47.4 mm, respectively. With the addition of a conventional resection of 1/3-1/2 inside the small joint for intra-operative decompression, the diameter of the general bone window is 14–18 mm and the area is 2.4–3.0 mm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies have proven the accuracy of MRI that has recently become a popular imaging modality, in vertebral measurements, identifying the details of its anatomy [12, 36]. Given its high resolution, it has largely replaced the computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of the several adjacent structures comprising the spine [36]. We utilized MRI for this study rather than CT scans, because it is more reliable in detecting soft tissue degeneration and hence choosing the cases for study [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the intervertebral foramen is located anteriorly to the vertebral canal at an angle of 45 o relative to the coronal plane [19]. Therefore, the oblique or axial views have greater confidence rates than the sagittal views, in order to evaluate the presence of foraminal stenosis or of a disc herniation [17,25,36,37,44]. CT -computed tomography; MRI -magnetic resonance imaging…”
Section: The Bony Borders Of the Intervertebral Foramenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have evaluated the vertebral body, spinal canal, and spinal cord [15,26,35]. However, an extremely limited number of studies have reviewed the complete anatomy of the cervical intervertebral foramen (Table 1) [8,10,25,38,40,48]. In fact, there is only one review article describing the anatomy of cervical intervertebral foramen as a whole, which focused on vascularisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%