1972
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1972-12907-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal solvability and 𝜙-accretive mappings of Banach spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) there exists > 0 such that, for each 1 , 2 ∈ ( ), We need the following definition which was given by Browder [17].…”
Section: (29)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) there exists > 0 such that, for each 1 , 2 ∈ ( ), We need the following definition which was given by Browder [17].…”
Section: (29)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Известные нам утверждения о свойствах выпуклости образов нелинейных операторов общего вида ограничи-ваются теоремой [1] о выпуклости замыкания F (X) для максимально монотон-ного по Минти-Браудеру оператора F : X → 2 X * в рефлексивном банаховом пространстве X. Для φ-аккретивных операторов F : X → Y в паре банаховых пространств (X, Y ) аналогичное утверждение см. в [2]. В то же время неиз-вестно сколько-нибудь широких классов интегральных операторов вида (1) со свойством (максимальной) монотонности или аккретивности.…”
Section: свойства выпуклости образов нелинейных интегральных операторовunclassified
“…Many authors (see [3], [4], [7], [10], [13], [16] and [17]) have studied domain invariance or surjectivity of accretive operators. The following theorem gives an improvement of Theorem 4.11 of [4], Corollary 2.2 of [6] and Theorem 3.4 of [13].…”
Section: Jong Sook Bae and Sangsuk Yiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let P be a nonlinear operator from a Banach space X into a Banach space 7. Many authors (see [3], [4], [6], [7], [10], [12], [13], [14] and [15]) have studied solvability of the equation Px = y, for y e Y, a considerable number of which involve local or infinitesimal assumptions on the operator P, by showing that P is surjective. However, in many cases, in general P need not be surjective, although for some y G y, the equation Px = y is solvable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%