2001
DOI: 10.1038/35088045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal faulting in central Tibet since at least 13.5 Myr ago

Abstract: Tectonic models for the evolution of the Tibetan plateau interpret observed east-west thinning of the upper crust to be the result of either increased potential energy of elevated crust or geodynamic processes that may be unrelated to plateau formation. A key piece of information needed to evaluate these models is the timing of deformation within the plateau. The onset of normal faulting has been estimated to have commenced in southern Tibet between about 14 Myr ago and about 8 Myr ago and, in central Tibet, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
208
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
208
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When taken with small total offsets (Taylor et al 2003), these relatively high slip rates imply that these structures have not been active for the entire period of the Indo-Asia collision, and possibly have been active only in the last 2-3 Ma (Taylor & Peltzer 2006). This is in contradiction to geochronological constraints of the onset of east-west extension at c. 8 Ma (Harrison et al 1995) or earlier at c. 13.5 Ma for normal faulting (Blisniuk et al 2001), or the initiation of slip on the Jiali Fault at between 18 and 12 Ma (Lee et al 2003), which suggests that movement on the central Tibetan faults may have accelerated through time. Meade (2007) did not attempt to resolve each of the conjugate faults on the plateau with the 17-microplate model, particularly in western Tibet where an arbitrary boundary was modelled as taking up 15 mm a À1 of right-lateral slip.…”
Section: Conjugate Strike-slip Faults Of Central Tibetcontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When taken with small total offsets (Taylor et al 2003), these relatively high slip rates imply that these structures have not been active for the entire period of the Indo-Asia collision, and possibly have been active only in the last 2-3 Ma (Taylor & Peltzer 2006). This is in contradiction to geochronological constraints of the onset of east-west extension at c. 8 Ma (Harrison et al 1995) or earlier at c. 13.5 Ma for normal faulting (Blisniuk et al 2001), or the initiation of slip on the Jiali Fault at between 18 and 12 Ma (Lee et al 2003), which suggests that movement on the central Tibetan faults may have accelerated through time. Meade (2007) did not attempt to resolve each of the conjugate faults on the plateau with the 17-microplate model, particularly in western Tibet where an arbitrary boundary was modelled as taking up 15 mm a À1 of right-lateral slip.…”
Section: Conjugate Strike-slip Faults Of Central Tibetcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Since then, dating of over 50 volcanic samples across the plateau has shown that shoshonitic volcanism has occurred sporadically from the time of collision (50 Ma) to today (Chung et al 2005, suggesting that no sudden delamination occurred at c. 8 Ma. North-south aligned normal faults in Tibet were initially assumed to be Pliocene-Pleistocene (Armijo et al 1988) and c. 13.5 Ma in age (Blisniuk et al 2001), but east-west extension is now known to have occurred across the entire plateau from c. 47 Ma to the present day based on dating of adakitic and ultrapotassic dykes . Early interpretations of a change from north-south compression to east-west extension in Tibet (e.g.…”
Section: Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are distributed mainly in the southern and central Tibetan Plateau [Molnar and Tapponnier, 1978;Armijo et al, 1986Armijo et al, , 1989Rothery and Drury, 1984], where topography reaches high altitudes. Field observations indicate that the magnitude of this extension is small (<1%) [Armijo et al, 1986] and rifting in southern and central Tibet started about 13.5-14 Ma ago [Yin et al, 1994;Coleman and Hodges, 1995;Harrison et al, 1995;Blisniuk et al, 2001].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of a high plateau and the buoyancy acting on the bottom of the plateau crust from the mantle may create an additional vertical compressive stress which can result in the relaxation of the topography and corresponding thinning of the crust together with the normal faulting activity. The altitude of the Tibetan plateau is so high with respect to its surroundings that active normal faulting may also be caused by gravitational collapse toward the plateau margins [25,32,33] A large number of thrust and strike-slip fault events occur in the front of the Himalayan Mountains. Many strikeslip fault events occur in the Karakorum and Altyn mountains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics and mechanism of extensional motions at the high altitudes of the Tibetan plateau have been analyzed [25][26][27][28][29]. The activities of normal faulting earthquakes concentrated at high altitudes were investigated based on distribution characteristics of stress field, GPS data, as well as geothermal data in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%