2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal estimation via shifted neighborhood for point cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 But it can be seen from the experimental comparison of the article, its computational efficiency is still lower than other classical algorithms. Cao et al 33 presented a fast and quality normal estimator based on neighborhood shift. Instead of using the neighborhood centering at the current point, a set of neighborhoods containing the current point are evaluated and the one with the most consistent normals is selected as the neighborhood of the current point.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 But it can be seen from the experimental comparison of the article, its computational efficiency is still lower than other classical algorithms. Cao et al 33 presented a fast and quality normal estimator based on neighborhood shift. Instead of using the neighborhood centering at the current point, a set of neighborhoods containing the current point are evaluated and the one with the most consistent normals is selected as the neighborhood of the current point.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, 19,20,33 s i is considered as a curvature and used to distinguish edge points, who have a more complicated neighborhood, from non-edge points. The coefficient of a point near sharp features is considered to be larger than that of a point in smooth regions.…”
Section: Edge Point Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33]- [35], σ i is considered as curvature and used to distinguish edge points, who have a more complicated neighborhood, from non-edge points. The coefficient of a point near sharp features is considered to be larger than that of a point in smooth regions.…”
Section: A Edge Points Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for the purpose of denoising, most of the methods are using the neighborhood centering at the point to filter the normals, which is prone to produce inaccurate normals. To conquer this problem, Cao et al [CCZ*18] presented a shifted neighborhood scheme to estimate normals. However, this method is not robust to large‐scale noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%