2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8478-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal boundary intersection method based on principal components and Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ratio applied to the multiobjective optimization of 12L14 free machining steel turning process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, there are many interacting parameters responsible for improving different machinability aspects including tool life, cutting force, surface finish and formation of small and stable built-up edges (Bouchelaghem et al, 2010;Kishawy et al, 2012;Peruchi et al, 2014;Song & Zuo, 2014;Xu et al, 2012). In all machining processes, including turning, controlling the workpiece-tool interaction associated with the workpiece material is extremely difficult, especially when combining these parameters to study their effects on machinability and/or surface characteristics and their impact on service life (Costa et al, 2016;Fnides et al, 2011). Due to this complexity of combinations and their impact, we need to find a model for optimizing these parameters to expect a better quality and productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, there are many interacting parameters responsible for improving different machinability aspects including tool life, cutting force, surface finish and formation of small and stable built-up edges (Bouchelaghem et al, 2010;Kishawy et al, 2012;Peruchi et al, 2014;Song & Zuo, 2014;Xu et al, 2012). In all machining processes, including turning, controlling the workpiece-tool interaction associated with the workpiece material is extremely difficult, especially when combining these parameters to study their effects on machinability and/or surface characteristics and their impact on service life (Costa et al, 2016;Fnides et al, 2011). Due to this complexity of combinations and their impact, we need to find a model for optimizing these parameters to expect a better quality and productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the quest is to optimize the cutting parameters, i.e. : feed rate, depth of cut and cutting speed, etc., in order to attain the minimum of surface roughness as an index of surface quality (Costa et al, 2016;Peruchi et al, 2014).The maximum of material removal rate and the minimum of cutting power as productivity and cost efficiency criterion (FNIDES et al, 2011;Kishawy et al, 2012;Kulekci et al, 2016). It is about performing a multi-objective optimization where the responses are correlated and may present conflicting results if each objective function is proceeded individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, when there are correlated responses being analyzed, those methods can be inadequate. If the variancecovariance structure among the responses is not considered, the optimization may lead to unsatisfactory results [4,5]. The presence of such correlation, according to [6], can influence the optimization results, since it can create errors in the regression coefficients and unbalance the mathematical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%