2008
DOI: 10.1038/ni.1678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonredundant and complementary functions of TRAF2 and TRAF3 in a ubiquitination cascade that activates NIK-dependent alternative NF-κB signaling

Abstract: The adaptor and signaling proteins TRAF2, TRAF3 and cIAP1 and cIAP2 were suggested to inhibit alternative nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling in resting cells by targeting NF-κB inducing kinase (NIK) to ubiquitin-dependent degradation, thus preventing processing of the NF-κB2 precursor protein p100 to release p52. However, the respective functions of TRAF2 and TRAF3 in NIK degradation and activation of alternative NF-κB signaling has remained elusive. We now show that CD40 or BAFF receptor activation resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

31
675
3
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 557 publications
(726 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
31
675
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, alternative NF-kB signaling in many cell types relies on NF-kB-inducing kinase (NIK), which is controlled in a complex manner through interaction with TRAF and IAP family members. Important in the context of our studies, regulation of NIK can be under the control of CD40 or BAFF signaling (Vallabhapurapu et al, 2008;Zarnegar et al, 2008). If and how CpG/TLR9 signaling interferes with these signaling pathways to affect NF-kB activity, in partcular in the context of CLL, is currently unresolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, alternative NF-kB signaling in many cell types relies on NF-kB-inducing kinase (NIK), which is controlled in a complex manner through interaction with TRAF and IAP family members. Important in the context of our studies, regulation of NIK can be under the control of CD40 or BAFF signaling (Vallabhapurapu et al, 2008;Zarnegar et al, 2008). If and how CpG/TLR9 signaling interferes with these signaling pathways to affect NF-kB activity, in partcular in the context of CLL, is currently unresolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[26][27][28] Apart from these chemicals, a set of biological ligand of the TNF family, such as lymphotoxin LTα 1 β 2 , CD40L or Tweak, also appeared to target c-IAP1/2 toward the proteasomal and/ or lysosomal degradative pathways. [29][30][31][32][33][34] c-IAP1/2 depletion leads to NIK (NF-κB-inducing kinase) stabilization and the phosphorylation of both IKKα and NF-κB2/p100 prior to the processing of p100 into p52, a pathway defined as the alternative, or non-canonical, NF-κB pathway. [35][36][37] Genetic mouse models revealed that NIK is required for the proper development and/or maintenance of secondary lymphoid organs, for osteoclastogenesis, for T-cell activation as well for B-cell survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). Although NIK stabilization is required for receptor-induced processing of p100 and activation of RelBp52 (refs 25,26), some basal processing of p100 and nuclear translocation of RelB-p52 does occur under resting conditions in the absence of visible NIK levels as well as in the absence of functional NIK 25,28 . Moreover, basal cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling of NF-kB family members has been reported to contribute to the basal transcriptional regulation of target genes by NF-kB 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were cultured for 48 h after transfection and the lentiviral particles were collected from the supernatants and were used to transduce different MM cell lines as described 25 . Thirty-six hours post infection, gene silencing efficiency was analysed by immunoblotting for the respective proteins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation