Key Points Autologous activated T cells can drive antigen-independent proliferation of CLL cells through CD40 and IL-21 signaling. An IL-21 gene induction signature, IL-21 mRNA, and protein can be found in CLL lymph node samples.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells circulating in peripheral blood (PB) differ from the leukemic fraction in lymph nodes (LNs) with respect to cell division and drug sensitivity. CD40 stimulation of PB CLL cells in vitro results in chemoresistance and provides a partial model for the LN microenvironment. The TLR9 ligand CpG induces proliferation in immunoglobulin variable heavychain-unmutated CLL, but apoptosis in immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain-mutated CLL. To juxtapose proliferative with antiapoptotic signals, we investigated the effects of CpG in the context of CD40 ligation in mutated versus unmutated CLL cells in this study. Prolonged CD40 ligation induced classical, followed by alternative nuclear factor-jB (NF-jB), activity in both subgroups, correlating with enhanced Bfl-1 and Bcl-X L levels, respectively. A dichotomy in NF-jB signaling occurred on combined CD40/TLR9 triggering. This induced declining p52 and Bcl-X L levels, and reversed chemoresistance only in mutated cells, whereas unmutated cells proliferated, maintained p52 and Bcl-X L and remained chemoresistant. The pivotal contribution of Bcl-X L to chemoresistance was shown by the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 and RNA interference. Finally, in ex vivo LN samples, p52, p65 and Bcl-X L levels were highly expressed, corroborating the in vitro findings. Thus, a distinction in NF-jB activation and drug susceptibility in mutated versus unmutated (LN-like) CLL cells was uncovered, which was causally linked to Bcl-X L levels.

2538 Background: There is a high unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with recurrent, metastatic, or persistent cervical cancer. Most patients are young and survival rates are poor. ORR for second line therapies is between 4 and 14% for chemotherapy and recently approved immunotherapy. Adoptive cell transfer using tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have demonstrated durable responses in some patients with recurrent cervical cancer thus offering the potential for long-term disease control. Methods: Study C-145-04 is an ongoing, open-label, multicenter Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of LN-145 TIL therapy in patients with advanced cervical cancer who have undergone at least one prior line of chemotherapy. Prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy is an exclusion criterion. The primary endpoint is ORR per RECIST 1.1; secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), and LN-145 safety. Tumors surgically harvested at local institutions are shipped to central GMP facilities for TIL generation in a 22-day manufacturing process. Final LN-145 TIL product is cryopreserved and shipped to sites. Patients receive one week of preconditioning lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide, fludarabine), a single LN-145 infusion, followed by up to 6 doses of IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg). Results: As of 4 Feb 2019, 27 efficacy-c patients have received Gen 2 of LN-145, with a mean age of 47 years and 2.6 mean prior lines of therapy. Preliminary efficacy results: ORR was 44% (1 CR, 9 PR, 2 uPR), DCR was 89% at 3.5-month median study follow-up with 11/12 patients maintaining their response. Improved responses were observed in 4 patients with longer follow-up. Mean TIL cells infused was 28x109. Median IL-2 doses administered was 6.0. The adverse event profile was generally consistent with the underlying advanced disease and the profile of the lymphodepletion and IL-2 regimens. Conclusions: LN-145 results in 44% ORR in previously treated cervical cancer patients with acceptable safety and efficacy profile. LN-145 offers patients a viable therapeutic option warranting further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03108495.

Purpose: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells in lymph nodes (LN), from which relapses are postulated to originate, display an antiapoptotic profile in contrast to CLL cells from peripheral blood (PB). The BH3 mimetic ABT-737 antagonizes the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-X L and Bcl-2 but not Mcl-1 or Bfl-1. Previously, it was shown that CD40-stimulated CLL cells were resistant to ABT-737. We aimed to define which antiapoptotic proteins determine resistance to ABT-737 in CLL and whether combination of known antileukemia drugs and ABT-737 was able to induce apoptosis of CD40-stimulated CLL cells.Experimental Design: To mimic the LN microenvironment, PB lymphocytes of CLL patients were cultured on feeder cells expressing CD40L and treated with ABT-737 with or without various drugs. In addition, we carried out overexpression or knockdown of pro-and antiapoptotic proteins in immortalized primary B cells.Results: Upon CD40 stimulation patient-specific variations in ABT-737 sensitivity correlated with differences in levels of Mcl-1 and its antagonist Noxa. Knockdown of Noxa, as well as Mcl-1 overexpression, corroborated the importance of the Noxa/Mcl-1 ratio in determining the response to ABT-737. Inhibition of NF-kB resulted in increased Noxa levels and enhanced sensitivity to ABT-737. Interestingly, increasing the Noxa/Mcl-1 ratio, by decreasing Mcl-1 (dasatinib and roscovitine) or increasing Noxa levels (fludarabine and bortezomib), resulted in synergy with ABT-737.Conclusions: Thus, the Noxa/Mcl-1 balance determines sensitivity to ABT-737 in CD40-stimulated CLL cells. These data provide a rationale to investigate the combination of drugs which enhance the Noxa/Mcl-1 balance with ABT-737 to eradicate CLL in chemoresistant niches.

Sensitivity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells to anti-CD20 mAbs is low and, therefore, the efficacy of monotherapy with current anti-CD20 mAbs is limited. At present, it is not known whether sensitivity of CLL cells to CD20 mAbs is modulated by microenvironmental stimuli. We have shown previously that in vitro CD40 stimulation of peripheral bloodderived CLL cells results in resistance to cytotoxic drugs. In the present study, we show that, in contrast, CD40 stimulation sensitizes CLL cells to the recently described novel type II anti-CD20 mAb GA101. Cell death occurred without crosslinking of GA101 and involved a lysosomedependent mechanism. Combining GA101 with various cytotoxic drugs resulted in additive cell death, not only in CD40-stimulated CLL cells, but also in p53-dysfunctional CLL cells. Our findings indicate that GA101 has efficacy against chemoresistant CLL, and provide a rationale for combining cytotoxic drugs with anti-CD20 mAbs. (Blood. 2011;118(19): 5178-5188) IntroductionAlthough treatment results for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have improved considerably over the last decade, a curative drug regimen is still lacking. Similar to other B-cell malignancies such as follicular lymphoma and multiple myeloma, in CLL, the interaction of the malignant cells with their microenvironment in the lymph nodes, spleen, and possibly BM has been shown to play an important role in the biology of the disease. 1 We and others have previously shown that in vitro CD40 stimulation of CLL cells can to a certain extent mimic the lymph node environment and results in the induction of resistance of the CLL cells to cytotoxic drugs such as fludarabine, chlorambucil, bortezomib, and roscovitine. [2][3][4][5][6] These microenvironmental niches might be an important localization of minimal residual disease and form the basis for the relapses characterizing this disease. 1,[3][4][5]7,8 Moreover, after sequential treatments, selection of p53 dysfunctional clones occurs in up to 50% of patients, 9,10 which also results in chemoresistance. Therefore, there is a need for new treatments that circumvent microenvironmental chemoresistance and act independently of p53, possibly including anti-CD20 mAb-containing regimens. 11,12 However, sensitivity of CLL cells to anti-CD20 mAbs in vitro is low and monotherapy with conventional doses of the type I anti-CD20 mAb rituximab has only limited efficacy in CLL. Because of rituximab resistance or unresponsiveness, more potent anti-CD20 mAbs are currently being sought. Two types of anti-CD20 mAbs have been described. A prime difference is that, in contrast to type I anti-CD20 mAbs, type II mAbs are unable to translocate CD20 into lipid rafts or to evoke Ca 2ϩ flux. [13][14][15][16] Ofatumumab, a second-generation type I anti-CD20 mAb seems promising for the treatment of CLL, 17 although large amounts seem to be required. GA101 is a novel glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 mAb. Compared with rituximab, GA101 has enhanced direct cell death-inducing capacity and improved Ab-depende...

Background: Participation of Adolescents and Young Adults with cancer (AYAs: 18–39 years at time of diagnosis) in patient-reported outcome studies is warranted given the limited knowledge of (long-term) physical and psychosocial health outcomes. We examined the representativeness of AYAs participating in the study, to observe the impact of various invitation methods on response rates and reasons for non-participation. Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional cohort study was performed among long-term (5–20 years) AYA cancer survivors. All participants were invited using various methods to fill in a questionnaire on their health outcomes, including enclosing a paper version of the questionnaire, and sending a reminder. Those who did not respond received a postcard in which they were asked to provide a reason for non-participation. Results: In total, 4.010 AYAs (response 36%) participated. Females, AYAs with a higher socio-economic status (SES), diagnosed more than 10 years ago, diagnosed with a central nervous system tumor, sarcoma, a lymphoid malignancy, stage III, or treated with systemic chemotherapy were more likely to participate. Including a paper questionnaire increased the response rate by 5% and sending a reminder by 13%. AYAs who did not participate were either not interested (47%) or did want to be reminded of their cancer (31%). Conclusion: Study participation was significantly lower among specific subgroups of AYA cancer survivors. Higher response rates were achieved when a paper questionnaire was included, and reminders were sent. To increase representativeness of future AYA study samples, recruitment strategies could focus on integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and involving AYA patients to promote participation in research.

PURPOSE Patients with testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) are at increased risk of developing a contralateral TGCT (CTGCT). Although some studies suggest that prior treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy affects CTGCT risk, a relationship between CTGCT risk and platinum dose has not previously been assessed. We analyzed the association between the number of platinum-based chemotherapy cycles and CTGCT risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS The risk of developing a metachronous CTGCT was evaluated in a nationwide cohort of 4,755 patients diagnosed with primary TGCT in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2007. Standardized incidence ratios were computed to compare CTGCT incidence with expected TGCT on the basis of TGCT incidence in the general population. The cumulative incidence of CTGCT was estimated in the presence of death as competing risk. The effect of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy on CTGCT risk was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS CTGCT was diagnosed in 136 patients (standardized incidence ratio, 14.6; 95% CI, 12.2 to 17.2). The cumulative incidence increased up to 20 years after primary diagnosis, reaching 3.4% (95% CI, 2.8% to 4.0%) after 20 years of follow up. The risk of developing a CTGCT decreased with age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.96), was lower after nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.96) and decreased with every additional cycle of chemotherapy (HRper cycle, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.85). CONCLUSION Approximately one in every 30 survivors of TGCT will develop a CTGCT, with CTGCT incidence increasing up to 20 years after a primary TGCT. Treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy shows a dose-dependent inverse association with CTGCT risk.

IntroductionIncreasingly more adolescent and young adult (AYA, aged 18–39 years) patients with an uncertain and/or poor cancer prognosis (UPCP) are gaining life-years because of novel treatments or refinement of established therapies, and sometimes even face the prospect of long-term disease control. This study aims to examine the challenges of AYAs with a UPCP in daily life to inform the development of AYA care programs.MethodsSemi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted among AYAs with a UPCP. Since we expected differences in experiences between three AYA subgroups, we interviewed patients of these subgroups (1): traditional survivors (2), low-grade glioma survivors, and (3) new survivors. Interviews were analyzed using elements of grounded theory. AYA patients were actively involved as research partners.ResultsIn total 46 AYAs with UPCP participated and shared their challenges in daily life. They were on average 33.4 years old (age range 23–44) and most of them were women (63%). The most common tumor types were low-grade gliomas (16), sarcomas (7), breast cancers (6), and lung cancers (6). We identified five primary themes: (1) feeling inferior to previous self and others (e.g. feeling useless, who wants me in a relationship), (2) feeling of being alone (e.g. lonely thoughts, nobody really gets me), (3) ongoing confrontation (e.g. it is always there, own decline), (4) grief about life (e.g. grief about life I did not get, grief about old life), and (5) loss of control over the future (e.g. not able to make future plans, waiting for growth). Although all of the challenges were identified in the three AYA subgroups, the perceived intensity of the challenges differed slightly between the subgroups.DiscussionAYAs living with a UPCP experience challenges associated to their sense of altered identity, their position in the social network, and the future uncertainties. This study highlights the importance to recognize and acknowledge the unique challenges of this group. To provide age-specific care, it is important to embed acceptance and commitment therapy and AYA peer support within the healthcare system and other care programs to support AYAs to live well with their disease.