2016
DOI: 10.1134/s1063776116030092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonradiative and radiative Förster energy transfer between quantum dots

Abstract: We study theoretically nonradiative and radiative energy transfer between two localized quantum emitters, donor one (i.e. initially excited) and acceptor one (i.e. receiving the excitation). The rates of nonradiative and radiative processes are calculated depending on the spatial and spectral separation between donor and acceptor states and for different donor and acceptor lifetimes for typical parameters of semiconductor quantum dots. We find that the donor lifetime can be significantly modified only due to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results show that this certainly is not the case for the Si NC ensembles investigated here, with none of the nine samples adhering to this rule. Also the degradation of the PL QY upon high-energy excitation has been observed previously for colloidal PbS [16] and Si NCs, [13] among others. In the low-energy range, the PL QY for all the samples exhibits an initial increase with the excitation energy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental results show that this certainly is not the case for the Si NC ensembles investigated here, with none of the nine samples adhering to this rule. Also the degradation of the PL QY upon high-energy excitation has been observed previously for colloidal PbS [16] and Si NCs, [13] among others. In the low-energy range, the PL QY for all the samples exhibits an initial increase with the excitation energy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…[2,12] The strength of the cooperative processes and their effect on the optical properties of an NC ensemble depend on the characteristics of the individual NCs themselves as well as on the ensemble properties, such as NC density and proximity, [13] confining potential of the embedding matrix [14] and its quality, etc. [2,12] The strength of the cooperative processes and their effect on the optical properties of an NC ensemble depend on the characteristics of the individual NCs themselves as well as on the ensemble properties, such as NC density and proximity, [13] confining potential of the embedding matrix [14] and its quality, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42,43 To exclude that the shortening of the PL decay lifetimes observed here is solely due to the modification of the emission rate in the far field caused by the substrate, we evaluate the expressions of α ¼ α k and α ¼ 1 2 ðα k þ α ⊥ Þ for a pure dielectric substrate of permittivity εðInPÞ ¼ 12.493, which are shown in Fig. 6 together with the expression for the case of an ensemble of randomly oriented dipoles hαi ¼ 2 3 α k þ 1 3 α ⊥ (light blue curves).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where τ D is the donor radiative lifetime in the presence of acceptor. The Förster radius, e.g., is 9 ± 2 nm in colloidal CdTe nanocrystal systems [30]; theoretically, it can approach 13 nm with τ 0 D 1 ns [39]. These values are comparable with the average distance between QDs at the 10 12 cm −2 lateral density.…”
Section: Competing Energy-transfer Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 81%