2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.99.012505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonperturbative analysis of nuclear shape effects on the bound electron g factor

Abstract: The theory of the g factor of an electron bound to a deformed nucleus is considered nonperturbatively and results are presented for a wide range of nuclei with charge numbers from Z=16 up to Z=98. We calculate the nuclear deformation correction to the bound electron g factor within a numerical approach and reveal a sizable difference compared to previous state-of-the-art analytical calculations. We also note particularly low values in the region of filled proton or neutron shells, and thus a reflection of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the FNS effect has be calculated using tabulated nuclear data [ 40 ] for root‐mean‐square radius values, with a Fermi or even with a deformed Fermi nuclear potential, [ 28,41 ] or with more realistic predictions based on the Skyrme‐type nuclear potential, [ 42 ] not forgetting about the nuclear deformation correction. [ 38 ] There is room for an improvement in the evaluation of the FKS effect as well, from a simple two‐sphere model to a more sophisticated and realistic one. The higher‐order QED effects, such as self‐energy, Wichmann–Kroll, Källén–Sabry, muonic and hadronic Uehling potentials [ 16,41,43 ] should be also included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the FNS effect has be calculated using tabulated nuclear data [ 40 ] for root‐mean‐square radius values, with a Fermi or even with a deformed Fermi nuclear potential, [ 28,41 ] or with more realistic predictions based on the Skyrme‐type nuclear potential, [ 42 ] not forgetting about the nuclear deformation correction. [ 38 ] There is room for an improvement in the evaluation of the FKS effect as well, from a simple two‐sphere model to a more sophisticated and realistic one. The higher‐order QED effects, such as self‐energy, Wichmann–Kroll, Källén–Sabry, muonic and hadronic Uehling potentials [ 16,41,43 ] should be also included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 36 ] For kaonic atoms the FNS correction has a much stronger impact, and therefore one should take into account also higher‐order terms in αZ$\alpha Z$ (see, e.g., refs. [37, 38]). As an outcome, the sensitivity coefficients depend significantly on the specific ion and transition, and can vary considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in order to perform more precise calculations of the FNS correction, it is necessary to use a more realistic nuclear-structure description and go beyond the simple Fermi model. As for other nuclear-structure corrections, we note that significant improvements in the evaluation of nuclear deformation and nuclear polarization effects have been made in recent years [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the leading-order finite nuclear size correction cancels out in the reduced g factor, the total finite nuclear size correction, which can be calculated numerically, following, for instance, the method developed in Refs. [35][36][37][38], is synonymous with the higher-order finite nuclear size correction. The uncertainty on this contribution is dominated by that on the nuclear radius, and was estimated for various H-like ions in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%