2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2894237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Estimation of Risk-Neutral Densities

Abstract: Summary. This chapter deals with nonparametric estimation of the risk neutral density. We present three different approaches which do not require parametric functional assumptions on the underlying asset price dynamics nor on the distributional form of the risk neutral density. The first estimator is a kernel smoother of the second derivative of call prices, while the second procedure applies kernel type smoothing in the implied volatility domain. In the conceptually different third approach we assume the exis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout the recent literature, there are papers using semiparametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating implied probability distribution (Breeden & Litzenberger, 2014;Datta, Londono, & Ross, 2017;Malz, 2014;Smith, 2012;Tavin, 2011), some of them are comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches (Aparicio & Hodges, 1998;Mizrach, 2010;Xiao & Zhou, 2017), while several are dealing with parametric (Arneri c et al, 2015;Cheng, 2010;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Grith & Kr€ atschmer, 2011;Khrapov, 2014;S€ oderlind, 2000;V€ ah€ amaa, 2005) or nonparametric approaches only (Andersen & Wagener, 2002;Bahaludin & Abdullah, 2017;Figlewski, 2009;Grith, H€ ardle, & Schienle, 2011;Jackwerth & Rubinstein, 1996). There are only few papers that compare various non-structural models for implied probability distribution estimation (Bliss & Panigirtzoglou, 2002;Coutant et al, 2001;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Jackwerth, 1999;Jondeau et al, 2007;Jondeau & Rockinger, 2000;Santos & Guerra, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the recent literature, there are papers using semiparametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating implied probability distribution (Breeden & Litzenberger, 2014;Datta, Londono, & Ross, 2017;Malz, 2014;Smith, 2012;Tavin, 2011), some of them are comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches (Aparicio & Hodges, 1998;Mizrach, 2010;Xiao & Zhou, 2017), while several are dealing with parametric (Arneri c et al, 2015;Cheng, 2010;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Grith & Kr€ atschmer, 2011;Khrapov, 2014;S€ oderlind, 2000;V€ ah€ amaa, 2005) or nonparametric approaches only (Andersen & Wagener, 2002;Bahaludin & Abdullah, 2017;Figlewski, 2009;Grith, H€ ardle, & Schienle, 2011;Jackwerth & Rubinstein, 1996). There are only few papers that compare various non-structural models for implied probability distribution estimation (Bliss & Panigirtzoglou, 2002;Coutant et al, 2001;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Jackwerth, 1999;Jondeau et al, 2007;Jondeau & Rockinger, 2000;Santos & Guerra, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related literature is linked to non‐parametric estimation of the risk‐neutral density, as in 8, 10, 23, 24. In this literature, the objective is to recover the risk‐neutral density as the non‐parametric estimate of the second derivative of the pricing function.…”
Section: No‐arbitrage In Option Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first works applying non-parametric regression à la Nadaraya-Watson in pricing problems is [1], where the authors, among other things, report impressive empirical results on the precision of semi-parametric estimators applied to pricing European call options on the S&P500. To date, a large literature deals with this approach to pricing -see, e.g., [7] and references therein, as well as [6,14] for related ideas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%