1982
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90218-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonmonotonic age changes in susceptibility to hypothermia-induced retrograde amnesia in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the reminder was just as effective in overcoming hypothermia-induced amnesia as it was in overcoming normal memory impairment (Experiment 1). These results contrast sharply with those reported by Mactutus et al (1982) and Richardson and Riccio (1987), who found no evidence of hypothermia-induced retrograde amnesia in 23-day-old rats. We believe the discrepancy between our results and those reported by them may be due to subtle procedural differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the reminder was just as effective in overcoming hypothermia-induced amnesia as it was in overcoming normal memory impairment (Experiment 1). These results contrast sharply with those reported by Mactutus et al (1982) and Richardson and Riccio (1987), who found no evidence of hypothermia-induced retrograde amnesia in 23-day-old rats. We believe the discrepancy between our results and those reported by them may be due to subtle procedural differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, others reported that the amnesia following reactivation was only transient [69]. Nevertheless, a number of studies confirmed the initial findings of Misanin et al [68] using different memory tasks and amnesic agents, including hypothermia and protein synthesis inhibitors [71,74,75]. A basic model that came from these experiments was that it is not the time elapsed since encoding that determines the susceptibility of the memory trace, but the functional state of the trace itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Several other findings that seem inconsistent with the consolidation view may in fact be compatible with that state dependent interpretation. For instance, it has been noted that several factors, including a strong training reinforcer, overtraining, pre-exposure to the conditioning context, or weak amnestic treatments, can reduce the susceptibility to retrograde amnesia (Geller et al, 1970; Miller, 1970; Mactutus et al, 1982; Parent and McGaugh, 1994; Garín-Aguilar et al, 2014). We suggest that when the information acquired during initial training is unusually strong, due to the use of numerous training trials or of a strong reinforcer, the internal state produced by the amnestic agent is less salient than the training state.…”
Section: State Dependency To Explain Retrograde Amnesiamentioning
confidence: 99%