Intelligent Hybrid Systems 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6191-0_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear System Identification with Neurofuzzy Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The output perturbation can be given in terms of the system input as in (2), and the prediction error for the indirect identification of the system can be given in terms of the closed-loop modelsĜ C andĤ C = 1 by:…”
Section: A Prediction Error Methods (Pem) Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1. The output perturbation can be given in terms of the system input as in (2), and the prediction error for the indirect identification of the system can be given in terms of the closed-loop modelsĜ C andĤ C = 1 by:…”
Section: A Prediction Error Methods (Pem) Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This renders the following proposition: Proposition 1: In local identification of a nonlinear feedback system with an integral action using a linear model structure, bias removal is unnecessary. 2 This proposition has two implications: First, for controller synthesis, techniques based on PL models can be utilized, and extension to piecewise affine models is unnecessary. Second, according to [13], [14], in feedback nonlinear systems with integral actions, the necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of a family of linear controllers (designed to stabilize the individual linearized models of the system) that stabilize the nonlinear system are readily satisfied.…”
Section: B Model Structure Selection: Linear Vs Affinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It implements a heuristic search for the rule premise parameters and avoids a time consuming nonlinear optimization. The LOLIMOT algorithm is described in five steps according to (Nelles, 1999(Nelles, , 2001):…”
Section: Locally Linear Neurofuzzy With Model Tree Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%