2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04915-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Subgrid-Scale Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Rotating Turbulent Flows

Abstract: Rotating turbulent flows form a challenging test case for large-eddy simulation (LES). We, therefore, propose and validate a new subgrid-scale (SGS) model for such flows. The proposed SGS model consists of a dissipative eddy viscosity term as well as a nondissipative term that is nonlinear in the rate-of-strain and rate-of-rotation tensors. The two corresponding model coefficients are a function of the vortex stretching magnitude. Therefore, the model is consistent with many physical and mathematical propertie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(220 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the kernel of the filter (Bedford & Yeo 1993). On the other hand, a general class of SGS model based on the local velocity gradient (Lund & Novikov 1992;Silvis et al 2019) can be expressed as…”
Section: Nn-based Sgs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the kernel of the filter (Bedford & Yeo 1993). On the other hand, a general class of SGS model based on the local velocity gradient (Lund & Novikov 1992;Silvis et al 2019) can be expressed as…”
Section: Nn-based Sgs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LES is a high-fidelity and effective CFD method that is broad used in the research of turbulence analysis [25][26][27] and wind farm computations [28][29][30]. In this study, in-house LES code LESGO [31] is used to compute the 3D flow field around a wind turbine in a neutral atmospheric boundary layer.…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Of Wind Turbine Wakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GEP model shows high similarity with the target, whereas the wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity (WALE) model [5], which is a popular linear model in industry, heavily over-estimates the shear stress. Additionally, a recent non-linear model proposed by Silvis [9] is also used for comparison. Even though the magnitude predicted by the non-linear model is at the same level as the target, the distribution of SGS stress is different.…”
Section: Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the magnitude predicted by the non-linear model is at the same level as the target, the distribution of SGS stress is different. There are more fine structures compared to the Gaussian-filtered DNS and the reason for this is that the non-linear model proposed by Silvis [9] only contains two terms (T 1 and T 2) and these two terms alone cannot produce the correct stress field. Figure 9 quantitatively indicates the similarity between the targets and GEP models by using the Pearson correlation.…”
Section: Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%