2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.09.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear observer control for full-state projective synchronization in chaotic continuous-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to achieve the modified projective synchronization, the controller u for the active control [15,20,21] is chosen to obtaiṅ…”
Section: Creation Of Hopf Limit Circles Based On Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to achieve the modified projective synchronization, the controller u for the active control [15,20,21] is chosen to obtaiṅ…”
Section: Creation Of Hopf Limit Circles Based On Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of the created limit circle can be well guaranteed in advance because the responses of the original dynamical system are directly synchronized with the existing Hopf limit circle of the drive system. Moreover, the amplitudes of the created limit circle can be arbitrarily diminished or enlarged by manipulating the scaling factors of MPS [14][15][16]. With the aid of the appropriate controller, the MPS between two nonidentical systems can be achieved and the center point of the created Hopf limit circle may be translated into any proper location required in real application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applications to secure communications, this feature can be used to extend binary digital to M-nary digital communication [6] for achieving fast communication. Projective synchronization of identical chaotic systems has been extremely investigated in recent years, including finite dimensional systems [4,[7][8][9], infinite dimensional systems [10][11][12], and complex networks [13,14]. But in practical situations, it is hardly the case that every component can be assumed to be identical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainieri and Rehacek [9] first proposed the chaos projective synchronization scheme in 1999, but it was still very difficult to achieve projective synchronization between two or more chaotic nonlinear systems until Wen et al [10,11] presented an observer-based control scheme for projective chaos synchronization in 2004, whose prominent advantage is "no special limitation" for nonlinear dynamical systems to achieve projective chaos synchronization. Wen and co-authors also tried to explore the potential applications of projective synchronization to noise reduction in mechanical engineering [12,13], design bifurcation solutions [14,15] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%