2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-010-9810-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Hopf limit circle to dynamical systems via modified projective synchronization

Abstract: In order to affirmatively utilize the characteristics of Hopf limit circle, a control method to design Hopf circle with proper characteristics into dynamical system is established based on the modified projective synchronization (MPS). The proposed method may serve as a complete solution to design a stable Hopf limit circle, which can simultaneously achieve the following three properties: with the desired amplitudes and shape changes, with the pre-specified location center, and at a pre-specified system parame… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mainieri and Rehacek [9] first proposed the chaos projective synchronization scheme in 1999, but it was still very difficult to achieve projective synchronization between two or more chaotic nonlinear systems until Wen et al [10,11] presented an observer-based control scheme for projective chaos synchronization in 2004, whose prominent advantage is "no special limitation" for nonlinear dynamical systems to achieve projective chaos synchronization. Wen and co-authors also tried to explore the potential applications of projective synchronization to noise reduction in mechanical engineering [12,13], design bifurcation solutions [14,15] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainieri and Rehacek [9] first proposed the chaos projective synchronization scheme in 1999, but it was still very difficult to achieve projective synchronization between two or more chaotic nonlinear systems until Wen et al [10,11] presented an observer-based control scheme for projective chaos synchronization in 2004, whose prominent advantage is "no special limitation" for nonlinear dynamical systems to achieve projective chaos synchronization. Wen and co-authors also tried to explore the potential applications of projective synchronization to noise reduction in mechanical engineering [12,13], design bifurcation solutions [14,15] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods and techniques [3,4,5] have been developed, and many types of synchronization have been presented [9,10,12,13,14] and their main attention was focused on the synchronization in continuous-time systems. However, many models mathematics of physical process, chemical , biology and ecology are given by discrete dynamical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on periodic-impact stability and chaotic behavior has been further expanded to different types of vibratory systems with clearances or motion limiting constraints; see Refs. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. A special feature of vibro-impact systems is the so-called grazing effect, which leads to singularity of the impact Poincar茅 maps, i.e., the instability caused by low-velocity collisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%