2020
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2020013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear model reduction on metric spaces. Application to one-dimensional conservative PDEs in Wasserstein spaces

Abstract: We consider the problem of model reduction of parametrized PDEs where the goal is to approximate any function belonging to the set of solutions at a reduced computational cost. For this, the bottom line of most strategies has so far been based on the approximation of the solution set by linear spaces on Hilbert or Banach spaces. This approach can be expected to be successful only when the Kolmogorov width of the set decays fast. While this is the case on certain parabolic or elliptic problems, most transport-d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the algebraic limitations associated with the solution of a rank-deficient system, the fact that the matrix S might be singular or ill conditioned prevents the reduced basis from evolving on the manifold of the orthosymplectic matrices. As shown in [26,Proposition 4.3], if U (t τ −1 ) ∈ U τ then U (t) ∈ R 2N ×2nτ solution of (7b) in T τ satisfies U (t) ∈ U τ for all t ∈ T τ , owing to the fact that F(U, Z; η h ) belongs to the space H U in (9).…”
Section: Reduced Dynamics Under Rank-deficiencymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to the algebraic limitations associated with the solution of a rank-deficient system, the fact that the matrix S might be singular or ill conditioned prevents the reduced basis from evolving on the manifold of the orthosymplectic matrices. As shown in [26,Proposition 4.3], if U (t τ −1 ) ∈ U τ then U (t) ∈ R 2N ×2nτ solution of (7b) in T τ satisfies U (t) ∈ U τ for all t ∈ T τ , owing to the fact that F(U, Z; η h ) belongs to the space H U in (9).…”
Section: Reduced Dynamics Under Rank-deficiencymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We remark that such preprocessing stage might be performed once during the offline stage, at the beginning of the online stage for any new µ ∈ P, or at each time step in combination with a suitable time-marching scheme. A fourth class of methods considers directly nonlinear approximations in combination with specialized methods to compute the solution during the online stage: to provide concrete references, we refer to the approaches based on convolutional autoencoders, [24,30,32,34], and to the approach in [20] based on optimal transport and nonlinear interpolation. As explained below (cf.…”
Section: Methods Based On Nonlinear Approximations: Expressivity and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us point out that for all µ ∈ P, f µ is a C 1 function on [0, 1]. In this case, it is known [13] that there exists a constant c > 0 such that d n (M) ≤ cn −2 for all n ∈ N * .…”
Section: Second Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%