2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2105.02024
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration-based model reduction of parameterized two-dimensional conservation laws

Andrea Ferrero,
Tommaso Taddei,
Lei Zhang

Abstract: We propose a nonlinear registration-based model reduction procedure for rapid and reliable solution of parameterized two-dimensional steady conservation laws. This class of problems is challenging for model reduction techniques due to the presence of nonlinear terms in the equations and also due to the presence of parameter-dependent discontinuities that cannot be adequately represented through linear approximation spaces. Our approach builds on a general (i.e., independent of the underlying equation) registra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several model reduction methods have been proposed that leverage nonlinear trial manifolds to overcome the reduction limitation set by the Kolmogorov n-width. One popular approach to construct such manifolds, and the approach adopted in this work, use a nonlinear parametrization of an affine space, usually a transformation of the underlying spatial domain [43,67,52,54,53,12,41,6,58,68,62,38,55,4,19,61], as described in Section 1.2. Many of these methods limit the trial manifold by decoupling the search for the transformation and subspace approximation, whereas the proposed approach simultaneously determines the subspace approximation and mapping that minimize the HDM residual (Section 3.4 highlights the significance of this distinction).…”
Section: Connection To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several model reduction methods have been proposed that leverage nonlinear trial manifolds to overcome the reduction limitation set by the Kolmogorov n-width. One popular approach to construct such manifolds, and the approach adopted in this work, use a nonlinear parametrization of an affine space, usually a transformation of the underlying spatial domain [43,67,52,54,53,12,41,6,58,68,62,38,55,4,19,61], as described in Section 1.2. Many of these methods limit the trial manifold by decoupling the search for the transformation and subspace approximation, whereas the proposed approach simultaneously determines the subspace approximation and mapping that minimize the HDM residual (Section 3.4 highlights the significance of this distinction).…”
Section: Connection To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each problem, we will compare the accuracy of fixed-domain model reduction and model reduction with implicit feature tracking; the accuracy of each method will be measured by the relative L 2 pΩ 0 q error with respect to the corresponding HDM solution (or exact solution, if available). For any µ P D and G P G, the fixed-domain ROM solution (dimension k) U k p ¨; G, µq, defined in (19) and either (23) (Galerkin) or (24) (minimum-residual), approximates the HDM solution U h p ¨; G, µq, defined in ( 9)- (10). For all cases considered, the domain mapping is frozen at the nominal map G " Ḡ and the reduced basis is constructed by applying POD to the HDM snapshots tU h p ¨; Ḡ, µq | µ P D tr u, where D tr Ă D is a finite training set.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%