2002
DOI: 10.1006/jfls.2001.0425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Inertial Loading. Part I: Accelerations in Steep 2-D Water Waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further information concerning the description of these wave groups is given in Baldock et al [17] and Johannessen & Swan [18]. In all cases, the process of obtaining the required wave event at the location of the column was as outlined by Swan et al [19]. In §4, much of the data analysis is based upon the regular wave cases (test cases 1-10 in table 1).…”
Section: (C) Test Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further information concerning the description of these wave groups is given in Baldock et al [17] and Johannessen & Swan [18]. In all cases, the process of obtaining the required wave event at the location of the column was as outlined by Swan et al [19]. In §4, much of the data analysis is based upon the regular wave cases (test cases 1-10 in table 1).…”
Section: (C) Test Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that it leads to the highest total loading from the second harmonic (Figure 5g), increasing with the increasing harmonics (Figure 5h-j). Swan et al (2002) [22] found that when fully nonlinear wave kinematics were used (Rienecker-Fenton in [22]), the nonlinearities in the hydrodynamic loading model (Rainey theory in [22]) were of smaller importance. In this study, nonetheless, as will also be seen in next sections, the importance of the nonlinearities in the hydrodynamic loading model is found to be greater for the more nonlinear wave kinematics than for linear.…”
Section: Distinction Between the Nonlinearities In Wave Kinematics Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Stansberg (1997) [21], on the other hand, FNV theory was the only numerical loading model. A wide selection of wave kinematics and hydrodynamic loading models were compared in the OC5 Phase Ib [7], but none of them was a consistent perturbation model, e.g., FNV or M&M. Swan et al (2002) [22] compared Morison equation and Rainey corrections on linear and fully nonlinear wave kinematics and determined that the nonlinearities in wave kinematics were more important than the nonlinearities in the hydrodynamic loading model because when the wave kinematics were fully nonlinear, the nonlinear corrections in the loading model became less relevant. The closest set-up to the present study has been conducted by the Wave Loads project [23] where Morison equation, Rainey theory, FNV and M&M were compared using fully nonlinear wave kinematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However these methods only allow measurement of velocity at a single fixed location. Swan et al (2002) carried out a number of experiments at different locations in order to calculate the velocity field on a spatial coordinate system. Hence it is recommended to use PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) for the calculation of velocity field in a spatial coordinate system by single experiment with minimum error (Sung and Doh, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%