2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39195-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear feedforward enabling quantum computation

Abstract: Measurement-based quantum computation with optical time-domain multiplexing is a promising method to realize a quantum computer from the viewpoint of scalability. Fault tolerance and universality are also realizable by preparing appropriate resource quantum states and electro-optical feedforward that is altered based on measurement results. While linear feedforward has been realized and become a common experimental technique, nonlinear feedforward was unrealized until now. In this paper, we demonstrate that a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hamiltonian H (3) from Equation ( 9) is responsible for two distinct photon number density-preserving processes, SPM and XPM, and a mode-mixing process, FWM. FWM is a rich effect, leading to optical frequency combs and soliton propagation in microresonators [43].…”
Section: Eigenstates Of Kerr Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Hamiltonian H (3) from Equation ( 9) is responsible for two distinct photon number density-preserving processes, SPM and XPM, and a mode-mixing process, FWM. FWM is a rich effect, leading to optical frequency combs and soliton propagation in microresonators [43].…”
Section: Eigenstates Of Kerr Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding Hamiltonian is diagonal in the Fock basis and, equivalently, conserves photon number for each mode. Our present objective is to solve for the time evolution of the field operator under photon number density-preserving Hamiltonian H 0 ≡ H (1) + H (3) such that H = H 0 + H (2) , where H (1) , H (2) , and H (3) are defined in Equations ( 7) and ( 9). We later show how this time evolution affects H (2) , producing a photon-number-selective interaction under the right conditions.…”
Section: Eigenstates Of Kerr Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By multiplexing of degrees of freedom such as time ( 20 , 21 ) or frequency ( 22 ) in the propagating wave, a large-scale quantum computation platform has already been demonstrated. Also, terahertz-bandwidth light source ( 23 ), 43-GHz optical homodyne measurement ( 24 ), and high-speed nonlinear feedforward ( 25 ), which are key components to high-speed optical quantum computation and error correction, have been demonstrated; this means that we can expect near-term optical quantum computation with a clock frequency of at least a few gigahertz, which surpasses other physical systems by several orders of magnitude. Despite these appealing features, however, the actual optical generation of GKP qubits in a propagating optical system has remained elusive because propagating electromagnetic systems lack viable strong nonlinearity, and even if we try to obtain nonlinearity by using a system such as cavity QED ( 26 ), a complex arrangement would be required to realize a complex quantum state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%