2009
DOI: 10.1021/tx9000754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Cancer Response at Ultralow Dose: A 40800-Animal ED001 Tumor and Biomarker Study

Abstract: Assessment of human cancer risk from animal carcinogen studies is severely limited by inadequate experimental data at environmentally relevant exposures, and procedures requiring modeled extrapolations many orders of magnitude below observable data. We used rainbow trout, an animal model well suited to ultra low-dose carcinogenesis research, to explore dose-response down to a targeted 10 excess liver tumors per 10,000 animals (ED001). A total of 40,800 trout were fed 0–225 ppm dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (DBP) for four… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One could surmise that low adduct levels can be efficiently repaired and hence are not highly mutagenic [15, 16]. In support of such argument, recent studies with large numbers of animals and mass spectrometry approaches that can detect DNA adducts as low as 1 per 10 9 to 10 10 have revealed that adduct formation at low doses is not linear [17]. Moreover, for adducts that can be formed by endogenous processes, the number of adducts induced by the exposure may be small compared to existing background levels, and therefore both endogenous and exogenous DNA adducts must be taken into account [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One could surmise that low adduct levels can be efficiently repaired and hence are not highly mutagenic [15, 16]. In support of such argument, recent studies with large numbers of animals and mass spectrometry approaches that can detect DNA adducts as low as 1 per 10 9 to 10 10 have revealed that adduct formation at low doses is not linear [17]. Moreover, for adducts that can be formed by endogenous processes, the number of adducts induced by the exposure may be small compared to existing background levels, and therefore both endogenous and exogenous DNA adducts must be taken into account [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there are examples of mutagens/genotoxic carcinogens for which the existence of a threshold was convincingly demonstrated, the expert consensus for regulatory purposes is that DNA adduct data should always be trumped by mutational and carcinogenicity data [22]. Nonetheless, the availability of highly sensitive methods for detection of DNA adducts [12, 17] continues to fuel the vanishing zero debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was not reported by Bailey et al (2009) as noted above, tumors were all assumed to be malignant. In the absence of time-to-tumor data, this assumption did not clearly constrain modeling results to predict responses that differ substantially from those that could be obtained by modeling separate benign and malignant DAH pathways.…”
Section: Models Fit To Ed 001 Tumor Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one should not assume that such a relationship will hold for all hepatocarcinogens. In a recent ED 001 study, almost 40 000 trout were administered dibenzo(def,p)chrysene (DBC) (formally called dibenzo[a,l]pyrene) in the diet to determine the dose that statistically would give one additional cancer in 1 000 animals (ED 001 ) (Bailey et al, 2009). Although DBC-DNA adducts in liver were linear at the lowest dose administered, hepatocarcinogenesis statistically became sub-linear at low dose.…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%